CVE-2024-11013
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCommand Injection vulnerability in NEC Corporation UNIVERGE IX from Ver9.2 to Ver10.10.21, for Ver10.8 up to Ver10.8.27, for Ver10.9 up to Ver10.9.14 and UNIVERGE IX-R/IX-V Ver1.2.15 and earlier allows a attacker to inject an arbitrary CLI commands to be executed on the device via the management interface.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in NEC UNIVERGE IX and IX-R/IX-V routers allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary CLI commands through the management interface. The vulnerability affects multiple version ranges from Ver9.2 through Ver10.10.21 (and earlier versions of 10.8, 10.9, and IX-R/IX-V), enabling full compromise of the network device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the NEC UNIVERGE device modelAccess the router CLI or web interface and determine if the device is an IX, IX-R, or IX-V series router. Use commands such as 'show system' or check the web interface device information page.Affected if The device is any model in the IX, IX-R, or IX-V series families.
-
Determine the installed firmware versionRun the CLI command 'show version' or check the firmware version displayed in the router web interface under System or Device Information sections.Affected if The installed version falls within Ver9.2 through Ver10.10.21, or is an earlier version of 10.8 or 10.9, or is any version of the IX-R or IX-V series prior to patching.
-
Verify management interface accessibilityCheck the router configuration for enabled management services using 'show ip http', 'show ip https', 'show telnet', or 'show ssh' commands. Review ACLs applied to management interfaces.Affected if The management interface (HTTP, HTTPS, Telnet, or SSH) is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet.
-
Confirm remote management is enabledExamine the router configuration for remote management settings. Look for 'ip http server', 'ip https server', or 'management http/https' statements in the configuration.Affected if Remote management services are enabled on WAN or externally-facing interfaces without IP-based access restrictions.
A user is affected if they are running any NEC UNIVERGE IX, IX-R, or IX-V router with firmware versions from Ver9.2 through Ver10.10.21 (or earlier 10.8/10.9 versions) and the device management interface is accessible to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate affected devices to the latest patched firmware version. Until patched, restrict management interface access to trusted IP addresses or networks using ACLs, and disable remote management if not required.
UNIVERGE IX series: Ver10.10.22 or later; UNIVERGE IX-R/IX-V: Ver1.2.16 or later
- 1. Identify the current installed version of NEC UNIVERGE IX or UNIVERGE IX-R/IX-V by accessing the device management interface or using 'show version' command.
- 2. Based on the product line and current version, determine the minimum fixed version needed: For UNIVERGE IX series, upgrade to Ver10.10.22 or later; For UNIVERGE IX-R/IX-V, upgrade to Ver1.2.16 or later.
- 3. Download the firmware update from the official NEC support portal at jpn.nec.com or authorized NEC distribution channels.
- 4. Review the firmware upgrade procedure in the NEC UNIVERGE IX Configuration Guide to ensure proper steps are followed.
- 5. Backup the current device configuration before initiating the upgrade.
- 6. Upload the new firmware file through the device management interface or via TFTP/FTP as specified in the upgrade procedure.
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by confirming the new firmware version after reboot.
- 8. Validate that the command injection vulnerability is no longer present by testing management interface functionality.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-11013 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-11013 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data