CVE-2024-11608
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA maliciously crafted SKP file, when linked or imported into Autodesk Revit, can be used to cause a Heap-based Overflow. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Autodesk Revit's SKP file import functionality. When the software parses a maliciously crafted SketchUp (SKP) file during linked or imported operations, it fails to properly validate buffer boundaries, allowing an attacker to overwrite heap memory and potentially execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2023, < 2023.1.7>= 2024, < 2024.3.2>= 2025, < 2025.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Autodesk Revit is installedCheck for Revit installation by looking in standard program directories (e.g., C:\Program Files\Autodesk\Revit 202X) or by running 'where revit.exe' in Command PromptAffected if Revit is not installed on the system
-
Identify installed Revit versionOpen Revit, go to Help > About Autodesk Revit, or check the executable properties ofRevit.exe in the installation folder to read the file versionAffected if The version falls within any of these ranges: 2023.0 to 2023.1.6, 2024.0 to 2024.3.1, or 2025.0 to 2025.3
-
Confirm SKP import functionality is accessibleIn Revit, attempt to access the Import or Link workflow (Insert tab > Link CAD or Import) and verify that .skp (SketchUp) file type appears in the supported format dropdownAffected if SKP file format is listed as an available import option and the user has permissions to use CAD link/import features
-
Check for recent SKP file operationsReview Revit project logs (located in %LOCALAPPDATA%\Autodesk\Revit\Revit<version>\Logs) or Windows Event Viewer for evidence of recent .skp file imports or linksAffected if SKP import or link operations have been performed on the system using an affected version
You are affected if Autodesk Revit is installed with a version in the ranges 2023.0-2023.1.6, 2024.0-2024.3.1, or 2025.0-2025.3, and the SKP file import/link feature is accessible or has been used.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2023.1.72024.3.22025.4
Organizations should avoid opening or importing SKP files from untrusted or unknown sources until Autodesk releases an official patch. If possible, implement file type restrictions and sandbox environments for handling untrusted CAD files.
Revit 2023.1.7 or later; Revit 2024.3.2 or later; Revit 2025.4 or later
- Identify the currently installed Autodesk Revit version by opening Revit and navigating to Help > About Autodesk Revit
- Determine which version range your current installation falls into (2023, 2024, or 2025)
- Download the appropriate fixed release from the Autodesk Account portal or official Autodesk support website: For Revit 2023, download version 2023.1.7 or later; For Revit 2024, download version 2024.3.2 or later; For Revit 2025, download version 2025.4 or later
- Close all running instances of Autodesk Revit before installing the update
- Run the installer with administrative privileges and follow the on-screen installation prompts
- Restart the computer after the installation completes
- Verify the installed version by opening Revit and checking Help > About Autodesk Revit to confirm the version matches the fixed release
- Test that importing or linking SKP files works correctly in the updated version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,296.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-11608 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-11608 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data