CVE-2024-11627
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited: Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability in Progress Sitefinity allows : Session Fixation.This issue affects Sitefinity: from 4.0 through 14.4.8142, from 15.0.8200 through 15.0.8229, from 15.1.8300 through 15.1.8327, from 15.2.8400 through 15.2.8421.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSession fixation vulnerability in Progress Sitefinity where the application fails to properly invalidate or regenerate session IDs during user authentication, allowing an attacker to set or fix a session ID before a user logs in and subsequently hijack the authenticated session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0, < 14.4.8143>= 15.0.8200, < 15.0.8230>= 15.1.8300, < 15.1.8328>= 15.2.8400, < 15.2.8422CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Sitefinity versionLog into the Sitefinity admin dashboard and navigate to Administration > Settings > About, or check the Sitefinity assembly version in the bin folder (Telerik.Sitefinity.dll). Compare the version number against the affected ranges: 4.0 to 14.4.8142, 15.0.8200 to 15.0.8229, 15.1.8300 to 15.1.8327, or 15.2.8400 to 15.2.8421.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the listed ranges.
-
Locate the web.config fileFind the web.config file in the root of the Sitefinity application directory. This file controls session and authentication settings.Affected if The web.config file is missing or not accessible for review.
-
Check Forms Authentication configurationIn the web.config file, locate the <forms> element under <authentication mode="Forms">. Verify if the slidingExpiration attribute is set to "true" and observe the timeout value.Affected if Forms Authentication is enabled with slidingExpiration="true" and the session fixation vulnerability exists in the affected version.
-
Verify session state configurationIn web.config, locate the <sessionState> element under <system.web>. Check if sessionState is enabled (mode="InProc", "SQLServer", or "StateServer").Affected if Session state is enabled and the application runs an affected version.
-
Check for session regeneration on loginInspect custom authentication code or Sitefinity login workflow to determine if SessionID is regenerated after successful authentication. This typically involves checking if System.Web.SessionState.HttpSessionIDManager is used to call InitializeRequest and that a new session cookie is issued post-login.Affected if The authentication workflow does not regenerate session IDs after login, leaving sessions vulnerable to fixation.
The environment is affected if Sitefinity is installed at a version within the affected ranges (4.0-14.4.8142, 15.0.8200-15.0.8229, 15.1.8300-15.1.8327, or 15.2.8400-15.2.8421) and session IDs are not regenerated upon user authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.4.814315.0.823015.1.8328
Update Sitefinity to a version beyond the affected ranges (14.4.8142, 15.0.8229, 15.1.8327, or 15.2.8421) or apply the vendor's security patch to ensure session IDs are regenerated upon authentication.
14.4.8143 (or latest 14.4.x); 15.0.8230 (or latest 15.0.x); 15.1.8328 (or latest 15.1.x); 15.2.8422 (or latest 15.2.x)
- Back up the current Sitefinity database and all custom code/configurations before upgrading.
- Review the Progress Sitefinity upgrade documentation for your current version to ensure compatibility.
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first to identify any potential issues.
- Upgrade Sitefinity to version 14.4.8143 or higher (for versions 4.0-14.4.x).
- If running version 15.0.x, upgrade to version 15.0.8230 or higher.
- If running version 15.1.x, upgrade to version 15.1.8328 or higher.
- If running version 15.2.x, upgrade to version 15.2.8422 or higher.
- Verify the upgrade was successful and test application functionality.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-11627 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-11627 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data