CVE-2024-11667
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA directory traversal vulnerability in the web management interface of Zyxel ATP series firmware versions V5.00 through V5.38, USG FLEX series firmware versions V5.00 through V5.38, USG FLEX 50(W) series firmware versions V5.10 through V5.38, and USG20(W)-VPN series firmware versions V5.10 through V5.38 could allow an attacker to download or upload files via a crafted URL.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA directory traversal vulnerability exists in the web management interface of Zyxel ATP, USG FLEX, USG FLEX 50(W), and USG20(W)-VPN series security gateways. Attackers can manipulate URLs using path traversal sequences (e.g., ../) to access files outside the intended web root directory, enabling unauthorized file downloads or potentially file uploads. The vulnerability affects firmware versions V5.00 through V5.38 across all affected product lines.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.00, <= 5.38>= 5.10, <= 5.38CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelLog into the firewall web management interface and navigate to Status > System Information, or use CLI command 'show system-info' to confirm the exact model (ATP, USG FLEX, USG FLEX 50(W), or USG20(W)-VPN series)Affected if The device is not one of the listed affected series (ATP, USG FLEX, USG FLEX 50W, USG20W-VPN)
-
Check the firmware versionIn the web interface, go to Maintenance > Firmware, or use CLI command 'show version' to determine the Zyxel Zld firmware version numberAffected if The firmware version falls within Zld >= 5.00 to <= 5.38 OR >= 5.10 to <= 5.38 (this covers all affected versions in the range)
-
Confirm web management interface is enabledIn the web interface, go to Configuration > System > WWW and verify if the HTTPS or HTTP management service is enabled; in CLI, check 'show http server' or 'show webgui'Affected if The web management interface (HTTP/HTTPS) is enabled and accessible
-
Assess network exposure of management interfaceCheck firewall rules or ACLs under Configuration > Security Policy > Policy Control to see if the management interface (typically WAN or DMZ) is exposed to untrusted networks; verify no ACL restricts access to management IP to trusted sources onlyAffected if The web management interface is reachable from untrusted network segments (e.g., directly exposed to internet or DMZ without IP restrictions)
A user is affected if they run an ATP, USG FLEX, USG FLEX 50(W), or USG20(W)-VPN device with Zld firmware between versions 5.00-5.38 (or 5.10-5.38) AND have the web management interface enabled and accessible from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate firmware to version V5.39 or later which contains the patch. If immediate updating is not feasible, restrict management interface access to trusted IP addresses only using firewall rules, and disable remote management capabilities if not required.
V5.39 or later (firmware version greater than V5.38)
- Identify the specific Zyxel device model (ATP, USG FLEX, USG FLEX 50W, or USG20(W)-VPN) from the affected product list
- Locate the firmware download section on support.zyxel.com for your specific device model
- Download the latest available firmware version. Based on the affected range (V5.00-V5.38), look for firmware versions beyond V5.38 (such as V5.39 or later)
- Follow the standard Zyxel firmware upgrade procedure: backup the current configuration, upload the new firmware via the web management interface or CLI, and restore the configuration
- After upgrade, verify the firmware version matches the patched release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-11667 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-11667 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data