CVE-2024-12082
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedin OpenHarmony v4.0.0 and prior versions allow a local attacker cause information leak through out-of-bounds Read.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOpenHarmony v4.0.0 and prior versions contain an out-of-bounds Read vulnerability that allows a local attacker to access memory outside the intended buffer boundaries, potentially exposing sensitive information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OpenHarmony versionRun the command to retrieve the system version (for example, 'cat /proc/version' or check system build information in the device settings or /etc/version file). Compare the displayed version against the affected range.Affected if The installed version is 4.0.0 or any prior version (for example, 3.x, 3.2, 3.1, etc.).
-
Verify the vulnerable component is activeDetermine whether the OpenHarmony system is running and accessible locally. Since this is a local privilege vulnerability, confirm that the system is operational and accepting local user sessions.Affected if The system is running and local users can interact with it.
-
Review local access controlsAudit local user accounts and permissions on the system. Check which users have shell access or can execute local programs.Affected if Untrusted or low-privilege local users exist on the system who could potentially exploit the out-of-bounds read.
-
Inspect for exploitation indicatorsReview system logs for unusual memory access patterns, unexpected read operations, or application crashes involving memory boundary violations. Check dmesg, system event logs, or security audit logs for out-of-bounds memory read attempts.Affected if Logs show anomalous memory access events or attempts to read beyond buffer boundaries.
The environment is affected if the installed OpenHarmony version is 4.0.0 or earlier AND untrusted local users have access to the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a version beyond v4.0.0 once the patch is available. In the interim, restrict local access to untrusted users and monitor for unusual memory access patterns.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-12082 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-12082 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data