CVE-2024-1225
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability classified as critical was found in QiboSoft QiboCMS X1 up to 1.0.6. Affected by this vulnerability is the function rmb_pay of the file /application/index/controller/Pay.php. The manipulation of the argument callback_class leads to deserialization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-252847. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA critical deserialization vulnerability exists in QiboSoft QiboCMS X1 (up to v1.0.6) in the rmb_pay function of /application/index/controller/Pay.php. The callback_class parameter is vulnerable to insecure deserialization, which could allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. The exploit is publicly disclosed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.0.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify QiboCMS X1 installationLocate the file /application/index/controller/Pay.php in the web root directory. If this file exists, QiboCMS X1 is installed.Affected if The Pay.php file exists in the application directory.
-
Determine the QiboCMS versionCheck for a version file or header in the application. Common locations include a version constant in core files, a version.txt file, or the admin panel. Compare the installed version against the affected range: <= 1.0.6.Affected if The installed version is 1.0.6 or lower.
-
Verify the vulnerable rmb_pay function existsInspect /application/index/controller/Pay.php and confirm the rmb_pay function is defined and contains processing of the callback_class parameter.Affected if The rmb_pay function exists and handles the callback_class parameter.
-
Confirm the application is network-accessibleDetermine if the web application is accessible over the network (not localhost-only orfirewalled). The vulnerability is exploitable remotely if the Pay.php endpoint is reachable.Affected if The application endpoint /index.php/pay/rmb_pay or similar is accessible from untrusted networks.
If QiboCMS X1 version 1.0.6 or lower is installed and the Pay.php file with the rmb_pay function is present and network-accessible, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince the vendor did not respond and no patch is available, immediate mitigations include deploying a WAF rule to block deserialization payloads on the callback_class parameter, disabling the affected Pay.php functionality if possible, or isolating the application from untrusted network access until a patch or code review/fix can be completed.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,296.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1225 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1225 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data