CVE-2024-12296
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Apus Framework plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data that can lead to privilege escalation due to a missing capability check on the 'import_page_options' function in all versions up to, and including, 2.4. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to update arbitrary options on the WordPress site. This can be leveraged to update the default role for registration to administrator and enable user registration for attackers to gain administrative user access to a vulnerable site. NOTE: This vulnerability was partially fixed in version 2.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Apus Framework WordPress plugin lacks a capability check on the import_page_options function, allowing any authenticated user with Subscriber-level access or higher to modify arbitrary WordPress options. Attackers can enable user registration and change the default role to Administrator, then register an account with full admin privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Apus Framework Superio is installedCheck your WordPress plugins or theme directory for the Apusthemes Superio theme/plugin and note its installed version numberAffected if The installed version is 2.3 or lower (the vulnerable versions)
-
Verify if user registration is enabledIn WordPress admin, go to Settings > General and check 'Membership: Anyone can register' - also check the wp_options table for 'users_can_register' value and who modified itAffected if User registration is enabled and was not intentionally enabled by an administrator
-
Audit user accounts for unauthorized AdministratorsNavigate to Users > All Users in WordPress admin and review all accounts with Administrator role, especially accounts you do not recognize or that were created recentlyAffected if There are Administrator accounts you did not create or that were created after the plugin was installed
-
Check for suspicious new user registrationsReview user registration dates in the wp_users table and correlate with plugin installation date or known admin activityAffected if New user accounts with Administrator role exist beyond the original admin account
You are affected if the Superio theme/plugin version is 2.3 or lower AND you find unauthorized Administrator accounts or unexpectedly enabled user registration that you did not configure.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to the latest version of Apus Framework (after 2.4) and audit existing user accounts for unauthorized administrators. Consider implementing WAF rules to block unauthorized option modifications until the patch is applied.
Apus Framework version 2.4 or later (or Superio theme version with patched Apus Framework)
- 1. Backup your WordPress database and files before making any changes.
- 2. Navigate to the WordPress admin dashboard and go to Plugins > Installed Plugins.
- 3. Locate the Apus Framework plugin (or Superio theme if the framework is bundled).
- 4. Check the current version number to confirm it is 2.4 or below.
- 5. Update the Apus Framework plugin to version 2.4 or later, or update the Superio theme to a version that includes the patched Apus Framework.
- 6. After updating, verify the 'import_page_options' function no longer allows unauthorized access by testing with a Subscriber-level account.
- 7. If the vulnerability persists after updating to 2.4, consider additional hardening measures such as limiting user registration settings and monitoring for unauthorized administrative accounts.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-12296 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-12296 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data