CVE-2024-12372
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA denial-of-service and possible remote code execution vulnerability exists in the Rockwell Automation Power Monitor 1000. The vulnerability results in corruption of the heap memory which may compromise the integrity of the system, potentially allowing for remote code execution or a denial-of-service attack.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA heap memory corruption vulnerability exists in the Rockwell Automation Power Monitor 1000 device. The vulnerability allows attackers to corrupt heap memory, potentially compromising system integrity. Successful exploitation can lead to remote code execution or denial-of-service conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Power Monitor 1000 device presenceInventory your network for Rockwell Automation Power Monitor 1000 hardware units. Check physical devices or network scans for this specific model designation.Affected if A Power Monitor 1000 unit is found in the environment
-
Retrieve device firmware versionAccess the device web interface, administrative console, or use SNMP to query the firmware version. Consult the device documentation for the exact command or interface path.Affected if The installed firmware version falls within the vulnerable version range (compare your version to vendor advisories)
-
Verify vulnerable network service exposureIdentify which network services or ports on the Power Monitor 1000 are accessible from untrusted network segments. Use port scanning or review firewall rules.Affected if The device services handling the vulnerable code path are exposed to untrusted networks
-
Review device logs for corruption indicatorsExamine system logs, crash dumps, or security event logs on the Power Monitor 1000 for signs of heap corruption, unexpected restarts, or memory allocation errors.Affected if Logs show heap memory corruption events or unusual memory-related failures
-
Check for unauthorized code execution artifactsReview any custom scripts, scheduled tasks, or unexpected processes that may indicate exploitation attempts or successful compromise.Affected if Evidence exists of unauthorized code execution or unexpected modifications to device configuration
A user is affected if they have a Power Monitor 1000 device running a vulnerable firmware version with exposed network services.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware patches when available and implement network segmentation to minimize exposure of the Power Monitor 1000 to untrusted networks.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-12372 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-12372 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data