CVE-2024-12530
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability in OpenText Secure Content Manager on Windows allows DLL Side-Loading.This issue affects Secure Content Manager: 23.4. End-users can potentially exploit the vulnerability to execute malicious code in the trusted context of the thick-client application.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a DLL side-loading vulnerability in OpenText Secure Content Manager 23.4 on Windows. The application uses an uncontrolled search path when loading DLLs, allowing attackers to place malicious DLLs in locations where the application will load them, executing code within the trusted context of the thick-client application with its elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm OpenText Secure Content Manager installationCheck Windows Programs and Features or look for the application in Program Files/Program Files (x86) directories. Note the installation path for further inspection.Affected if OpenText Secure Content Manager is present on the system
-
Verify installed version is 23.4In Programs and Features, locate the OpenText Secure Content Manager entry and confirm the version shown is exactly 23.4. Alternatively, right-click the main executable in the installation folder and check File Version in Properties.Affected if Version displayed is 23.4
-
Identify the application executable and its directoryLocate the main executable file (.exe) for the application in its installation folder. This is the directory where the vulnerable DLL loading occurs.Affected if The application executable exists in its installation directory
-
Inspect application directory for unauthorized DLLsList all .dll files in the application installation directory. Compare against expected/legitimate DLLs. Look for recently added, unusual, or mismatched DLL files that could be malicious.Affected if Unexpected or unauthorized DLL files are present in the application directory
-
Check directory write permissionsRight-click the application installation folder, go to Properties, then Security tab. Review which users or groups have Write or Modify permissions on the folder.Affected if Users other than administrators or the system account have Write permissions to the application directory
A system is affected if OpenText Secure Content Manager version 23.4 is installed and unauthorized DLL files exist in the application directory or if writable permissions allow attackers to place malicious DLLs in the DLL search path.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patches when available. Until then, restrict application execution to controlled environments, remove write permissions from application directories, and monitor for suspicious DLL loading activity.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-12530 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-12530 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data