CVE-2024-12562
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe s2Member Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 241216 via deserialization of untrusted input from the 's2member_pro_remote_op' vulnerable parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it could allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe s2Member Pro WordPress plugin is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection via deserialization of untrusted input in the 's2member_pro_remote_op' parameter. Unauthenticated attackers can inject arbitrary PHP objects, and while the plugin itself lacks a POP chain, additional plugins or themes on the target system could provide one to achieve remote code execution, file deletion, or data exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 250214CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify s2Member Pro plugin is installedCheck the WordPress plugins directory or access wp-admin/plugins.php to list installed plugins and look for 's2Member Pro'Affected if s2Member Pro appears in the installed plugins list
-
Check installed s2Member Pro versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins > s2Member Pro and read the version number displayed beneath the plugin name; compare it to the affected range of versions before 250214Affected if The installed version is lower than 250214 (e.g., 250101, 240912, etc.)
-
Confirm the plugin is activeIn WordPress admin at wp-admin/plugins.php, verify that s2Member Pro shows as 'Active' rather than 'Inactive' or 'Must-Use'Affected if s2Member Pro is active and the version is below 250214
-
Inspect HTTP request logs for the vulnerable parameterReview web server access logs (Apache, Nginx) or WordPress audit logs for requests containing 's2member_pro_remote_op' as a parameter name, especially from unauthenticated sourcesAffected if Any HTTP requests to the site contain the s2member_pro_remote_op parameter (this indicates the attack surface is exposed)
-
Audit environment for potential POP chain sourcesList all active plugins and themes on the WordPress installation; research whether any provide PHP magic methods (__wakeup, __destruct, __get, __call) that could be chained with the object injectionAffected if Additional plugins or themes with exploitable POP chains are present and active alongside vulnerable s2Member Pro
The environment is affected if s2Member Pro version is below 250214, the plugin is active, and the s2member_pro_remote_op parameter is processing untrusted input, especially when other plugins with POP chain capabilities are present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped250214
Update s2Member Pro to the latest patched version immediately. If no patch is available, disable the plugin and audit the WordPress environment for other plugins/themes that could provide a POP chain.
250214
- Update the s2Member Pro plugin for WordPress to version 250214 or later via the WordPress plugin dashboard, or replace the plugin files with the version 250214 release.
- Verify the update was successful by checking the installed plugin version in the WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins.
- Confirm the 's2member_pro_remote_op' parameter is no longer processing untrusted deserialized data.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-12562 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-12562 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data