Sensitive Information in LogsWeakness · CWE-532

CVE-2024-12569

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Disclosure of sensitive information in a Milestone XProtect Device Pack driver’s log file for third-party cameras, allows an attacker to read camera credentials stored in the Recording Server under specific conditions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The vulnerability allows disclosure of sensitive camera credentials through a log file generated by the Milestone XProtect Device Pack driver. Camera authentication credentials stored in the Recording Server are being written to log files, which can be accessed by an attacker under specific conditions.

MitigationRestrict access to the log files and ensure the Device Pack driver is updated to a version that masks or excludes credentials from logging. Review and rotate any potentially exposed camera credentials as a precautionary measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Milestone XProtect installation
    Check if Milestone XProtect Video Management Software is installed by looking for the XProtect directory in Program Files or checking Windows Services for Recording Server components
    Affected if XProtect is not installed, this CVE does not apply
  2. Locate Device Pack driver version
    In XProtect Management Application, go to Devices > Hardware > Device Packs, or check the installed Device Pack version from Add/Remove Programs or the Milestone installation logs
    Affected if Unable to determine Device Pack version or version is unknown/older than current release
  3. Find XProtect log files
    Locate the XProtect log directory, typically found in the Installation folder or in the Recording Server data directory (check %PROGRAMFILES%\Milestone\XProtect Recording Server\Logs or similar paths)
    Affected if No XProtect log files found or access denied to log directories
  4. Search log files for credentials
    Open log files using a text editor or search tool (such as findstr on Windows or grep on other platforms) and look for patterns that may contain camera authentication credentials, passwords, or sensitive authentication tokens
    Affected if Log files contain plaintext credentials, password strings, or authentication tokens associated with camera configuration
  5. Verify log file access controls
    Review file system permissions on the log directory to determine if unauthorized users or processes can read the log files
    Affected if Log files are readable by users other than administrators or the Recording Server service account

If Milestone XProtect is running with a Device Pack that writes camera credentials to accessible log files, the environment is affected by this credential disclosure vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict access to the log files and ensure the Device Pack driver is updated to a version that masks or excludes credentials from logging. Review and rotate any potentially exposed camera credentials as a precautionary measure.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-12569 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-12569 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data