CVE-2024-12648
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in TIFF data EXIF tag processing of Small Office Multifunction Printers and Laser Printers(*) which may allow an attacker on the network segment to trigger the affected product being unresponsive or to execute arbitrary code. *: Satera MF656Cdw/Satera MF654Cdw firmware v05.04 and earlier sold in Japan. Color imageCLASS MF656Cdw/Color imageCLASS MF654Cdw/Color imageCLASS MF653Cdw/Color imageCLASS MF652Cdw/Color imageCLASS LBP633Cdw/Color imageCLASS LBP632Cdw firmware v05.04 and earlier sold in US. i-SENSYS MF657Cdw/i-SENSYS MF655Cdw/i-SENSYS MF651Cdw/i-SENSYS LBP633Cdw/i-SENSYS LBP631Cdw firmware v05.04 and earlier sold in Europe.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in TIFF data EXIF tag processing in multiple Canon Satera, Color imageCLASS, and i-SENSYS printer models allows a network-adjacent attacker to cause denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code via specially crafted TIFF image files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 05.04<= 05.04<= 05.04<= 05.04<= 05.04<= 05.04<= 05.04<= 05.04CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify printer modelCheck the device label on the printer or access the web interface (http://[printer-ip]) to view the product name under the General or Device Information sectionAffected if model is one of Canon MF455dw, MF453dw, MF452dw, MF451dw, MF465dw, MF462dw, MF656cdw, or MF654cdw
-
Check firmware versionIn the printer web interface, navigate to Settings > Device Settings or Firmware Update section to view the current firmware version; alternatively, print a configuration page from the control panelAffected if firmware version is 05.04 or lower (e.g., 05.04, 05.03, 05.02, etc.)
-
Confirm TIFF/EXIF processing capability is in useThe vulnerability is triggered when the printer processes TIFF image files containing EXIF data; check if the printer is configured to accept print jobs from network sources or scan-to-email/file workflows that handle TIFF imagesAffected if the printer accepts network print jobs or processes TIFF images from external sources
You are affected if you have a Canon MF455dw/453dw/452dw/451dw/465dw/462dw/656cdw/654cdw printer with firmware version 05.04 or lower and the device processes TIFF images from network sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate affected printer firmware to a version later than v05.04; if immediate update is not possible, isolate vulnerable devices on a restricted network segment to limit exposure.
Firmware version > 05.04 (specific fixed version available on Canon support sites)
- 1. Identify the exact model number of the Canon device from the affected product list (MF455dw, MF453dw, MF452dw, MF451dw, MF465dw, MF462dw, MF656cdw, MF654cdw, or related regional variants)
- 2. Check the current firmware version installed on the device through the device's control panel or web interface
- 3. Navigate to the official Canon support website for your region (canon.jp, www.usa.canon.com, or www.canon-europe.com depending on your location)
- 4. Locate the firmware download section for your specific model
- 5. Download the latest firmware version available for your device model
- 6. Follow Canon's firmware update instructions, typically involving uploading the firmware file through the device's web interface or USB connection
- 7. After updating, verify the firmware version has changed from <=05.04 to a higher version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-12648 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-12648 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data