CVE-2024-12782
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in Fujifilm Business Innovation Apeos C3070, Apeos C5570 and Apeos C6580 up to 24.8.28 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /home/index.html#hashHome of the component Web Interface. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The vendor explains that "during technical verification it is not possible to reproduce any active actions like reboots which were mentioned in the original researcher disclosure."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper authorization vulnerability in the web interface of Fujifilm Business Innovation Apeos C3070, C5570, and C6580 multifunction printers. The issue affects the /home/index.html#hashHome endpoint, allowing unauthorized access to sensitive functionality. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable and has been publicly disclosed, though the vendor disputes its reproducibility.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device modelAccess the device web interface or check the physical device label to identify the exact model numberAffected if Device is an Apeos C3070, C5570, or C6580 model
-
Identify firmware versionAccess the device web interface administrative panel or print a configuration/status page to locate the installed firmware versionAffected if Firmware version has not been updated to include the vendor fix
-
Determine web interface accessibilityAttempt to access the device web interface from an unauthorized network location or browser session without authentication credentialsAffected if The web interface is reachable without valid authentication
-
Test vulnerable endpoint exposureNavigate to or send an HTTP GET request for the /home/index.html#hashHome endpoint without providing authenticationAffected if The endpoint returns sensitive functionality or device controls without requiring authorization
The environment is affected if the device is an Apeos C3070, C5570, or C6580 model running firmware that allows unauthenticated access to the /home/index.html#hashHome endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataContact Fujifilm Business Innovation for the latest firmware patch addressing this authorization flaw. If no patch is available, restrict network access to the device's web interface using firewall rules or VLAN isolation until a fix is released.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,872.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-12782 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-12782 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data