CVE-2024-12896
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in Intelbras VIP S3020 G2, VIP S4020 G2, VIP S4020 G3 and VIP S4320 G2 up to 20241222 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /web_caps/webCapsConfig of the component Web Interface. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor assesses that "the information disclosed in the URL is not sensitive or poses any risk to the user".
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability in Intelbras VIP series surveillance cameras (S3020 G2, S4020 G2, S4020 G3, S4320 G2) allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information through the /web_caps/webCapsConfig endpoint in the web interface. The issue is an information disclosure flaw in a web component that can be exploited without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the camera's web interface or check the device label/documentation to confirm the exact model number (S3020 G2, S4020 G2, S4020 G3, or S4320 G2)Affected if The model is one of: S3020 G2, S4020 G2, S4020 G3, or S4320 G2
-
Check firmware versionLog into the camera's web interface and navigate to System > Firmware/Version or System > Information to find the installed firmware versionAffected if Firmware version is older than the latest available from Intelbras for the affected models
-
Verify web interface accessibilityAttempt to access the camera's web interface (typically HTTP port 80 or HTTPS port 443) from a network locationAffected if The web interface is reachable from network segments where untrusted users could access it
-
Test vulnerable endpointUsing a web browser or curl command, access the URL: http://[camera-ip]/web_caps/webCapsConfig (or HTTPS equivalent) without providing any login credentialsAffected if The endpoint returns sensitive configuration information (such as credentials, system settings, or network details) without requiring authentication
A user is affected if they have an Intelbras VIP camera model S3020 G2, S4020 G2, S4020 G3, or S4320 G2 with accessible web interface where the /web_caps/webCapsConfig endpoint returns sensitive data without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict network access to affected devices using firewall rules or network segmentation. Monitor for unauthorized access attempts to the web interface. Check vendor for firmware updates.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-12896 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-12896 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data