dbcve.org
SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2024-12913

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Megatek Communication System Azora Wireless Network Management allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Azora Wireless Network Management: through 20250916.  NOTE: The vendor did not inform about the completion of the fixing process within the specified time. The CVE will be updated when new information becomes available.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SQL Injection vulnerability in Megatek Communication System Azora Wireless Network Management allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through user input that is not properly sanitized. The vulnerability affects version 20250916 and earlier. CVSS 8.8 indicates exploitation could lead to unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or potential remote code execution depending on database configuration.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database interactions. Validate and sanitize all user inputs. Apply a WAF as an interim control. Monitor for the vendor patch release and test thoroughly once available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Megatek Azora Wireless Network Management is installed
    Locate the application installation directory or check running services for 'Megatek' or 'Azora' components. Query installed software inventory if available.
    Affected if The product is present in the environment.
  2. Identify the installed version
    Check the application version through its web interface About/Help page, configuration files in the installation directory, or product-specific registry entries if on Windows.
    Affected if Version cannot be determined or falls within an affected release range.
  3. Identify exposed input interfaces
    Enumerate all web forms, API endpoints, login fields, search functionality, and parameter-driven URLs that accept user input. Document each input point that interacts with backend database queries.
    Affected if User-accessible input fields exist that submit data to the application.
  4. Verify input sanitization in database queries
    Review application configuration or source code (if accessible) to determine if input fields are handled with parameterized queries or if raw input is concatenated into SQL statements. Check for presence of prepared statement implementations.
    Affected if Database queries use string concatenation with user input rather than parameterized queries.
  5. Check database configuration exposure
    Verify if the application database user has elevated privileges beyond what is required for normal operation. Review database user permissions and application database connection configuration.
    Affected if Database user has excessive permissions (such as DROP, DELETE, or administrative privileges) or connections are not properly isolated.

The environment is affected if Megatek Azora Wireless Network Management is installed, user input fields are exposed without parameterized query implementation, and the application handles SQL statements through unsanitized input.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database interactions. Validate and sanitize all user inputs. Apply a WAF as an interim control. Monitor for the vendor patch release and test thoroughly once available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-12913 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-12913 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data