CVE-2024-12916
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Agito Computer Life4All allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Life4All: before 10.01.2025.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in Agito Computer Life4All allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user input, potentially enabling unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or data manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Life4All installationLocate the Agito Computer Life4All application installation directory and check for version files or metadata that contain the software version numberAffected if The installed version is any version released before 10.01.2025, as these lack the proper input sanitization and parameterized queries that fix the SQL injection flaw
-
Determine exact version numberReview version files, about dialogs, or software metadata within the Life4All installation to obtain the precise version stringAffected if The version cannot be confirmed as released on or after 10.01.2025, leaving uncertainty about whether the fix has been applied
-
Review application database query logsExamine database logs or application logs that record SQL queries executed by Life4All, looking for unusual SQL syntax patterns that may indicate injection attemptsAffected if Log entries show SQL commands containing suspicious characters, UNION statements, OR conditions in WHERE clauses, or other patterns typical of SQL injection attacks directed at user input fields
-
Inspect web request logs for injection indicatorsCheck HTTP access logs, web server logs, or application access logs for incoming requests to Life4All that contain SQL meta-characters in parameters (such as quotes, semicolons, comment sequences, or UNION keywords)Affected if Requests to the application contain unsanitized SQL syntax in user-supplied parameters, suggesting the vulnerability may be exploitable or has been targeted
-
Verify input handling mechanismIf source code or configuration is accessible, inspect how user input is processed before being used in database queries - look for direct string concatenation versus parameterized query usageAffected if User input fields are used directly in SQL queries without proper sanitization or parameterized queries, confirming the vulnerable code pattern described in the CVE
-
Check for unauthorized database access indicatorsReview database user accounts, permissions, and recent changes to database tables or records that were not part of normal business operationsAffected if Unexpected changes to database contents, new database users, or privilege escalations are found that correlate with the timeframes of suspicious SQL activity
A user is affected if they are running any version of Agito Computer Life4All released before 10.01.2025, or if logs show evidence of SQL injection attempts or successful exploitation through user input fields.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Life4All version released on or after 10.01.2025 which implements proper input sanitization and parameterized queries. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement input validation and review database access controls as compensating measures.
Agito Computer Life4All version 10.01.2025 or later
- Obtain the fixed version of Agito Computer Life4All (version 10.01.2025 or later) from the vendor through official channels
- Apply the upgrade following vendor-provided installation instructions
- After upgrading, verify that the SQL injection vulnerability is no longer present by testing input fields that could be used for SQL injection
- Review application logs for any indicators of exploitation prior to the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-12916 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-12916 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data