Authorization Bypass (IDOR)Weakness · CWE-639

CVE-2024-13040

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The QOCA aim from Quanta Computer has an Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability. By controlling the user ID parameter, remote attackers with regular privileges could access certain features as any user, modify any user's account information and privileges, leading to privilege escalation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The QOCA aim application has an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability where the user ID parameter is not properly validated server-side. An authenticated attacker can manipulate this parameter to impersonate other users, access unauthorized features, and modify account information and privileges for any user in the system.

MitigationImplement proper server-side authorization checks to validate that the authenticated user has permission to access or modify the requested user resource. All user operations should verify the current user's permissions against the target user ID before executing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate QOCA aim installation
    Search for QOCA aim executables, services, or web application files in common installation directories such as /opt/qoca, /var/www/qoca, C:\Program Files\QOCA, or check system services for a running qoca or aim service.
    Affected if QOCA aim software is present on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Check the application version through its main executable, about dialog, version file, or configuration files typically found in the installation directory. Common files include version.txt, about.html, or the application manifest.
    Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or is earlier than the fixed version that addresses this IDOR vulnerability
  3. Verify user management features are enabled
    Check if the application has user account management, profile editing, or privilege assignment features enabled. Look for user-related tables in the database or configuration flags indicating user management is active.
    Affected if User management features are enabled and accessible to authenticated users
  4. Inspect user-related API endpoints
    Review the application's web endpoints, API routes, or service calls that accept a user ID parameter. Look for patterns like /user/{id}, /profile?id=, or similar RESTful routes handling user data.
    Affected if Endpoints accepting user ID parameters exist without visible authorization checks in the request handling code
  5. Review authentication and authorization configuration
    Examine application configuration files, role definitions, or permission settings to determine if per-user authorization checks are implemented for user resource access.
    Affected if No explicit server-side validation exists to confirm the authenticated user has permission to access or modify the requested user resource by ID

A defender is affected if QOCA aim is installed with user management features enabled and the application lacks server-side authorization checks to validate user ID parameters before allowing access or modification of user resources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper server-side authorization checks to validate that the authenticated user has permission to access or modify the requested user resource. All user operations should verify the current user's permissions against the target user ID before executing.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-13040 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-13040 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data