CVE-2024-13149
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection'), CWE - 200 - Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Arma Store Armalife allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Armalife: through 20250916. NOTE: The vendor did not inform about the completion of the fixing process within the specified time. The CVE will be updated when new information becomes available.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Arma Store Armalife allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user input, potentially enabling complete database compromise, unauthorized access to sensitive information, or system takeover.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Arma Store Armalife is presentSearch for application files, directories, or running services named 'Armalife', 'Arma Store', or related gaming server management components. Check web server document roots for characteristic Armalife file structures.Affected if The application is installed and running in the environment.
-
Identify database interaction codeLocate PHP or other server-side files that handle database queries. Search for patterns involving SQL keywords (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE) combined with user-supplied variables or parameters.Affected if Dynamic SQL queries exist that incorporate user input without visible sanitization.
-
Review user input entry pointsExamine form handlers, URL parameters, API endpoints, and HTTP request processors for direct use in SQL statements. Focus on login, search, filtering, and profile update functions.Affected if User-controllable data flows directly into database queries without parameterized query usage.
-
Check for prepared statements or input validationSearch codebase for PDO prepare(), mysqli_prepare(), or equivalent parameterized query implementations. Look for sanitization functions or input validation routines applied before database operations.Affected if No parameterized queries or input validation is found in the SQL execution paths using user input.
The environment is affected if Arma Store Armalife is present AND the application uses dynamic SQL queries that incorporate unsanitized user input directly into database operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) across all application entry points, implement strict input validation, and apply principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-13149 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-13149 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data