CVE-2024-13275
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAccess of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') vulnerability in Drupal Security Kit allows HTTP DoS.This issue affects Security Kit: from 0.0.0 before 2.0.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA type confusion vulnerability in the Drupal Security Kit module allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted HTTP requests. The vulnerability stems from the module improperly handling resource types, leading to unexpected behavior that can crash the application or consume excessive resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Security Kit module is installedCheck for the presence of the Security Kit module in your Drupal installation. Common paths: modules/contrib/seckit or modules/seckit. You can also run: drush pm-list --status=enabled | grep -i seckitAffected if The Security Kit module is present and enabled in the Drupal installation
-
Determine installed Security Kit versionCheck the module version by examining the seckit.info.yml file in the module directory, or run: drush pm-releases seckitAffected if The installed version is lower than 2.0.3 (e.g., 2.0.2, 2.0.1, 1.x series, or any version below 2.0.3)
-
Confirm module is processing HTTP requestsReview the Security Kit module configuration at /admin/config/security/seckit or via drush config-get seckit.settingsAffected if The Security Kit module is enabled and actively processing HTTP requests, which makes it reachable by crafted requests
The environment is affected if the Drupal Security Kit module is installed and enabled with a version lower than 2.0.3.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.0.3
Upgrade Drupal Security Kit to version 2.0.3 or later to resolve the vulnerability.
2.0.3
- 1. Back up your Drupal site files and database before making any changes.
- 2. Update the Security Kit module to version 2.0.3 using Composer: `composer update drupal/seckit --with-all-dependencies`
- 3. Alternatively, via Drupal admin: Navigate to Extend > Check for updates and install the Security Kit 2.0.3 update.
- 4. Run Drupal database updates if prompted: `drush updatedb` or via admin at /update.php
- 5. Clear the Drupal cache: `drush cr` or via admin at Configuration > Performance > Clear all caches
- 6. Verify the update was successful by checking the Security Kit version at admin/config/system/seckit
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-13275 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-13275 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data