CVE-2024-13295
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Drupal Node export allows Object Injection.This issue affects Node export: from 7.X-* before 7.X-3.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Drupal Node export module versions before 7.X-3.3 suffer from a deserialization vulnerability where untrusted data is processed without proper validation. This Object Injection flaw could allow an attacker to instantiate malicious PHP objects, potentially leading to code execution or other downstream attacks depending on available gadget chains in the Drupal environment.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.x-3.0, < 7.x-3.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Node Export module is installedLocate the node_export module directory in the Drupal modules folder (commonly sites/all/modules or web/modules). Check for the presence of the node_export directory containing .info and .module files.Affected if Node Export module directory exists in the Drupal modules path
-
Determine the installed Node Export versionOpen the node_export.info file (or node_export.module) and locate the version line (e.g., version = 7.x-3.x). Compare this version number against the affected range.Affected if Version is 7.x-3.0, 7.x-3.1, or 7.x-3.2 (any version before 7.x-3.3)
-
Check if the module is enabledQuery the Drupal system table via database (SELECT status FROM system WHERE name = 'node_export') or use Drush command 'drush pm-list --status=enabled' to list enabled modules. Alternatively, check via Drupal admin interface at /admin/modules.Affected if Node Export module shows status as enabled or 1 in the system table
If the Node Export module is installed with version 7.x-3.0 through 7.x-3.2 and is enabled, the environment is vulnerable to deserialization attacks via this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.x-3.3
Update the Node export module to version 7.X-3.3 or later to obtain the patch. If immediate updating is not possible, consider disabling or removing the Node export module until the update can be applied.
7.x-3.3
- Backup your Drupal site database and files before updating
- Update the Node export module to version 7.x-3.3 via your package manager (composer) or by downloading from Drupal.org
- Clear Drupal caches after updating (drush cr or admin UI)
- Verify the module version shows 7.x-3.3 at admin/modules
- Test Node export functionality to confirm the site works as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-13295 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-13295 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data