CVE-2024-1350
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Prasidhda Malla Honeypot for WP Comment.This issue affects Honeypot for WP Comment: from n/a through 2.2.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA Missing Authorization vulnerability exists in the Prasidhda Malla Honeypot for WP Comment plugin (versions up to 2.2.3). The vulnerability allows unauthenticated or unauthorized users to bypass the honeypot protection mechanism intended to block spam comments. This likely stems from missing capability checks or improper nonce validation in the plugin's comment processing functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify plugin is installedCheck for the presence of the Honeypot for WP Comment plugin in wp-content/plugins/ directory or via WordPress admin Plugins pageAffected if Plugin is found in the WordPress installation
-
Check installed versionRead the plugin header comment in the main plugin file (typically honeypot-wp-comment.php) to obtain the Version field, or query via WP CLI: wp plugin get honeypot-wp-comment --field=versionAffected if Version is 2.2.3 or lower
-
Confirm plugin is activeCheck plugin status via WordPress admin or WP CLI: wp plugin is-active honeypot-wp-commentAffected if Plugin is active and processing comments
-
Verify honeypot protection is configuredInspect plugin settings in WordPress admin under the Honeypot for WP Comment configuration page, or examine the wp_options table for relevant honeypot setting recordsAffected if Honeypot protection is enabled in plugin settings
User is affected if the plugin version is 2.2.3 or lower and the honeypot protection feature is active, since the missing authorization flaw allows bypassing this protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Honeypot for WP Comment plugin to the latest version which should include proper authorization checks. If no update is available, implement manual authorization checks (current_user_can() and nonce validation) in the plugin's comment handling functions.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1350 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1350 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data