CVE-2024-1355
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA command injection vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an attacker with an editor role in the Management Console to gain admin SSH access to the appliance via the actions-console docker container while setting a service URL. Exploitation of this vulnerability required access to the GitHub Enterprise Server instance and access to the Management Console with the editor role. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.12 and was fixed in versions 3.11.5, 3.10.7, 3.9.10, and 3.8.15. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server's Management Console allows attackers with editor role to execute arbitrary commands via the actions-console docker container when setting a service URL, potentially achieving admin SSH access to the appliance.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.8.15>= 3.9.0, < 3.9.10>= 3.10.0, < 3.10.7>= 3.11.0, < 3.11.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed GitHub Enterprise Server versionAccess the Management Console and navigate to the 'About' page, or run `ghe-version` via SSH if you have admin access to the applianceAffected if The installed version falls within these vulnerable ranges: < 3.8.15, >= 3.9.0 but < 3.9.10, >= 3.10.0 but < 3.10.7, or >= 3.11.0 but < 3.11.5
-
Verify Management Console access controlsReview the Management Console authentication settings and network access controls to determine if editor-role accounts could be accessed by untrusted usersAffected if The Management Console is accessible to users with editor role who are not fully trusted administrators
-
Enumerate editor-role accountsIn the Management Console, go to 'Users' or 'Access management' and list all accounts assigned the editor roleAffected if There are editor-role accounts that were not explicitly created by trusted administrators
-
Inspect actions-console service URL configurationIn the Management Console, navigate to the Actions settings or Docker container service URL configuration panel and examine the current service URL value for the actions-console containerAffected if The actions-console docker container service URL contains unexpected characters, multiple URLs, or payloads that were not explicitly set by administrators
A user is affected if their GitHub Enterprise Server version is within the vulnerable ranges listed AND they have untrusted accounts with editor role who can access the Management Console actions-console service URL configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.8.153.9.103.10.7
Upgrade to GitHub Enterprise Server versions 3.11.5, 3.10.7, 3.9.10, 3.8.15 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict Management Console access to trusted administrators only and audit existing editor-role accounts.
3.11.5 (or the latest 3.x release >= your current branch's fixed version)
- 1. Identify the current GitHub Enterprise Server version running in your environment
- 2. Based on your current version branch, upgrade to the corresponding fixed version: 3.8.15, 3.9.10, 3.10.7, or 3.11.5
- 3. If possible, upgrade to the latest stable release (3.11.5 or later if available) to get all security fixes
- 4. After upgrade, verify that the Management Console is accessible and functioning normally
- 5. Review Management Console settings, particularly the actions-console service URL configuration, to ensure no unauthorized changes were made
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1355 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1355 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data