CVE-2024-13739
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Newsletters plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the "to" parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.9.9.7 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick an admin user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Newsletters WordPress plugin versions up to 4.9.9.7 contain a reflected Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the 'to' parameter. The parameter is not properly sanitized on input or escaped on output, allowing injection of malicious JavaScript code through a crafted URL.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.9.9.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins > Newsletters. The version number is displayed under the plugin name. Alternatively, check the main plugin file header in wp-content/plugins/newsletters-lite/newsletters.php or wp-content/plugins/newsletters/newsletters.phpAffected if Version is 4.9.9.7 or earlier (< 4.9.9.8)
-
Verify plugin is activeIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and confirm the Newsletters plugin shows as 'Active'Affected if Plugin is active and the vulnerable code is loaded
-
Identify pages using the 'to' parameterSearch plugin source code for occurrences of $_GET['to'], $_REQUEST['to'], or the parameter name 'to' to identify which admin pages or public forms accept this parameterAffected if The plugin handles a 'to' parameter in requests
-
Test for reflected XSS in the 'to' parameterLocate a page that accepts the 'to' parameter (such as subscription forms or newsletter sending interfaces). Append ?to=<script>alert(1)</script> to the URL and observe if the parameter value is reflected back unescaped in the HTML outputAffected if The 'to' parameter value is rendered in the page HTML without proper escaping (sanitization on input and escaping on output are both missing)
-
Inspect code handling the 'to' parameterExamine the PHP file that processes the 'to' parameter. Look for missing sanitize_text_field, esc_html, esc_attr, or similar sanitization functions before output, and missing input validation functions like sanitize_text_field or filter_var on inputAffected if Code shows no sanitization on input (e.g., no sanitize_text_field, esc_attr) and no escaping on output (e.g., no esc_html, esc_attr)
You are affected if the Newsletters plugin version is 4.9.9.7 or earlier, the plugin is active, and the 'to' parameter is processed and reflected in page output without sanitization and escaping.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.9.9.8
Update the Newsletters plugin to a version beyond 4.9.9.7. As a temporary measure, instruct administrators to avoid clicking untrusted links that may contain the malicious 'to' parameter.
4.9.9.8
- Backup your WordPress site before making any changes
- Update the Newsletters plugin to version 4.9.9.8 or later through WordPress admin dashboard (Plugins > Updates)
- Verify the update was successful by checking the plugin version
- Clear any site caches if applicable
- Review admin action logs for any suspicious links clicked around the time of potential exploitation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,192.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-13739 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-13739 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data