CVE-2024-13801
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe BWL Advanced FAQ Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data that can lead to a denial of service due to a missing capability check on the 'baf_set_notice_status' AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.4. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to update option values to '1' on the WordPress site. This can be leveraged to update an option that would create an error on the site and deny service to legitimate users or be used to set some values to true such as registration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe BWL Advanced FAQ Manager WordPress plugin lacks a capability check on the 'baf_set_notice_status' AJAX action, allowing any authenticated user with Subscriber-level access or higher to update arbitrary WordPress options to '1'. This broken access control vulnerability enables attackers to modify site settings, potentially causing denial of service through invalid option values or enabling sensitive features like user registration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if BWL Advanced FAQ Manager plugin is installedCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'bwl-advanced-faq-manager' or similar, and examine the main plugin file header for the version number.Affected if The plugin is found and the version is 2.1.4 or lower (or version cannot be determined).
-
Locate the vulnerable AJAX handlerSearch the plugin files for the string 'baf_set_notice_status' to identify the AJAX action handler function.Affected if The function 'baf_set_notice_status' or its hook 'wp_ajax_baf_set_notice_status' exists in the plugin code.
-
Inspect the AJAX handler for capability checksExamine the PHP code of the identified handler function and verify whether it calls a function like 'current_user_can()' with a privileged capability (e.g., 'manage_options') before performing the option update.Affected if No capability check (or a weak check like 'edit_posts') is found before the option update logic.
-
Check for proper nonce validationLook for nonce verification (e.g., 'check_ajax_referer' or 'wp_verify_nonce') within the AJAX handler function.Affected if No nonce validation is present in the handler.
-
Test access with low-privilege account (if authorized)Using an authenticated session with Subscriber-level access, send a POST request to /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php with action=baf_set_notice_status and a test option name/value to observe if the option is modified.Affected if The request succeeds and the specified WordPress option is set to '1' without error.
You are affected if the BWL Advanced FAQ Manager plugin is installed at version 2.1.4 or below and the 'baf_set_notice_status' AJAX handler lacks a capability check allowing any authenticated user to modify arbitrary options.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataAdd a capability check (e.g., current_user_can('manage_options')) and proper nonce validation to the 'baf_set_notice_status' AJAX handler. Verify if a patched version exists beyond 2.1.4, and consider disabling the plugin until a fix is available.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-13801 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-13801 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data