CVE-2024-13975
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Commvault for Windows versions 11.20.0, 11.28.0, 11.32.0, 11.34.0, and 11.36.0. In affected configurations, a local attacker who owns a client system with the file server agent installed can compromise any assigned Windows access nodes. This may allow unauthorized access or lateral movement within the backup infrastructure. The issue has been resolved in versions 11.32.60, 11.34.34, and 11.36.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA local privilege escalation vulnerability in Commvault for Windows allows an attacker with ownership of a client system running the file server agent to compromise assigned Windows access nodes, potentially enabling unauthorized access or lateral movement within the backup infrastructure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Commvault is installed on the systemCheck for Commvault installation directory at C:\Program Files\Commvault\ContentStore\ or look for Commvault services in Services.mscAffected if Commvault software is not found on the system, the system is not affected by this CVE
-
Identify the installed Commvault versionRun 'commvault -version' from the Command Prompt in the Commvault bin directory, or check the registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Commvault Systems\Galaxy\Instance001\CVLTVersionAffected if The installed version is lower than 11.32.60, 11.34.34, or 11.36.8 (any version prior to these patch releases)
-
Confirm the file server agent is deployedOpen Commvault Command Center or run 'qlist -ia' to list installed agents; look for 'File Server' agent typeAffected if A file server agent is assigned to and running on this client system
-
Check for assigned Windows access nodesIn Commvault Command Center, navigate to the file server agent settings to view assigned access nodes, or run 'qoperation exec -app 'File Server' -cmd 'GetAgent'' to query access node assignmentsAffected if This client has one or more Windows access nodes assigned to it for backup operations
-
Verify service account context of Commvault servicesOpen Services.msc, locate Commvault services (like 'Commvault Galaxy Service'), right-click and check the 'Log On' account configurationAffected if The Commvault services run under a privileged domain account rather than a restricted service account
The system is affected if Commvault for Windows is installed with a version below 11.32.60, 11.34.34, or 11.36.8 AND the file server agent is running with access nodes assigned, allowing an attacker with client ownership to escalate privileges to those access nodes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Commvault installations to version 11.32.60, 11.34.34, or 11.36.8 or later to resolve the vulnerability.
Upgrade to Commvault 11.32.60, 11.34.34, or 11.36.8 depending on your current release branch
- Identify your current Commvault version by checking the About section in the Commvault Command Center or via the CVLTVersion registry key
- Determine which upgrade path applies: if on 11.32.x, upgrade to 11.32.60; if on 11.34.x, upgrade to 11.34.34; if on 11.36.x, upgrade to 11.36.8
- Download the applicable service pack from the Commvault Support Portal or your designated update repository
- Stop all Commvault services on the affected server before upgrading
- Execute the Commvault installer and follow the on-screen prompts to apply the upgrade
- Restart Commvault services after the upgrade completes
- Verify the installed version matches the expected fixed version via the Command Center or CVLTVersion
- Test that the file server agent and access node functionality operate normally
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-13975 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-13975 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data