CVE-2024-1619
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedKaspersky has fixed a security issue in the Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server. The issue was that an attacker could potentially force an administrator to click on a malicious link to perform unauthorized actions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server. An unauthenticated attacker could craft malicious links that, when clicked by an authenticated administrator, could trick the admin's browser into sending unintended requests to perform unauthorized administrative actions on the mail server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0, <= 8.0.3.30CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Kaspersky Security for Linux Mail Server is installedCheck for the presence of Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server on the system. Look for installation directories or use package management tools to list installed Kaspersky products.Affected if The product is not installed on the system.
-
Identify installed versionRetrieve the installed version of Kaspersky Security for Linux Mail Server. Common methods include checking the application version via command line, reviewing installation logs, or querying the package manager for the installed Kaspersky Security version.Affected if The installed version is between 8.0 and 8.0.3.30 inclusive.
-
Verify web management interface is enabledDetermine if the web management interface for Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server is enabled and accessible. Check the configuration settings or service status that controls web interface access.Affected if The web management interface is enabled and exposed to network access.
-
Check for CSRF token protectionInspect the web management interface requests, particularly state-changing operations like configuration modifications or administrative actions, to determine if anti-CSRF tokens are implemented in the requests.Affected if Anti-CSRF tokens are NOT present in state-changing operations.
A system is affected if Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server is installed with a version between 8.0 and 8.0.3.30 inclusive AND the web management interface is enabled, regardless of whether anti-CSRF tokens are present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch from Kaspersky to obtain the fixed version. Additionally, implement anti-CSRF tokens in all state-changing operations within the web management interface to prevent forced request execution.
Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server version > 8.0.3.30 (check support.kaspersky.com for exact fixed release number)
- Check Kaspersky support portal (support.kaspersky.com) for the specific fixed version of Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server
- Locate the patch or updated version for CVE-2024-1619
- Download and install the updated version from official Kaspersky channels
- After upgrade, verify the web interface is accessible and confirm the version number matches the fixed release
- Review administrator sessions and consider invalidating existing sessions as a precaution
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1619 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1619 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data