CVE-2024-1635
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in Undertow. This vulnerability impacts a server that supports the wildfly-http-client protocol. Whenever a malicious user opens and closes a connection with the HTTP port of the server and then closes the connection immediately, the server will end with both memory and open file limits exhausted at some point, depending on the amount of memory available. At HTTP upgrade to remoting, the WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit leaks connections if RemotingConnection is closed by Remoting ServerConnectionOpenListener. Because the remoting connection originates in Undertow as part of the HTTP upgrade, there is an external layer to the remoting connection. This connection is unaware of the outermost layer when closing the connection during the connection opening procedure. Hence, the Undertow WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit is not notified of the closed connection in this scenario. Because WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit creates a timeout task, the whole dependency tree leaks via that task, which is added to XNIO WorkerThread. So, the workerThread points to the Undertow conduit, which contains the connections and causes the leak.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Undertow servers supporting wildfly-http-client protocol, WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit leaks connections during HTTP upgrade to remoting when RemotingConnection is closed prematurely. The outer connection layer is unaware of the innermost Undertow conduit when closing, preventing WriteTimeoutStreamSinkConduit from being notified of the closed connection. This causes the timeout task (and its dependency tree) to leak into the XNIO WorkerThread, leading to memory and file descriptor exhaustion.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 1.0all versions= 7.4= 4.11= 4.12= 4.9= 4.10= 4.9= 4.10all versions= 7.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Undertow-based server is in useCheck running Java processes for JBoss, WildFly, or Undertow components. Review application dependencies (pom.xml, lib folder) for undertow-core or jboss-undertow-core artifacts.Affected if Undertow server is running and wildfly-http-client protocol is enabled
-
Confirm wildfly-http-client protocol is enabledReview Undertow subsystem configuration (standalone.xml, domain.xml) or client configuration files for 'http-remoting' or 'wildfly-http-client' protocol handler definitions. Check if the application uses HTTP upgrade for remoting.Affected if wildfly-http-client protocol is configured and used for HTTP upgrade connections
-
Check Undertow version for patch statusLocate the undertow-core JAR file in the deployment and check its version. Compare against known patched versions. For Red Hat products, check the errata or package version for the Undertow security update.Affected if Undertow version is unpatched and wildfly-http-client protocol is in use
-
Monitor for connection leak symptomsObserve JVM heap usage and open file descriptor count over time during active HTTP upgrade remoting traffic. Use jstack or thread dumps to look for accumulation of WriteTimeout tasks in XNIO worker threads.Affected if Memory grows and file descriptors increase without release during normal operation with remoting connections
-
Review network listener configurationExamine the undertow subsystem's <http-listener> or <https-listener> elements in configuration files. Check if HTTP upgrade is enabled and remoting connectors are exposed.Affected if HTTP upgrade to remoting is enabled on any public-facing or internal listener
A user is affected if they run an Undertow-based server with wildfly-http-client protocol enabled for HTTP upgrade to remoting, and the Undertow version is unpatched.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Undertow to the patched version containing the fix, or disable wildfly-http-client protocol if not required, and implement connection limit controls at the network level to mitigate DoS impact.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1635 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- security.netapp.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1635 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data