CVE-2024-1725
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in the kubevirt-csi component of OpenShift Virtualization's Hosted Control Plane (HCP). This issue could allow an authenticated attacker to gain access to the root HCP worker node's volume by creating a custom Persistent Volume that matches the name of a worker node.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in the kubevirt-csi component of OpenShift Virtualization's Hosted Control Plane allows authenticated attackers to access the root HCP worker node's volume by creating a custom Persistent Volume with the same name as a worker node.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.13= 4.14= 4.15= 4.13= 4.14= 4.15= 4.13= 4.14= 4.15= 4.13= 4.14= 4.15= 4.13= 4.14= 4.15CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if OpenShift Virtualization Hosted Control Plane is deployedRun 'oc get hvms -A' to list Hyperconverged resources, or check for 'kubevirt-csi' namespace with 'oc get ns | grep kubevirt'Affected if kubevirt-csi namespace or Hyperconverged resources exist, indicating the vulnerable component is present
-
Check kubevirt-csi operator installation statusRun 'oc get deployment -n kubevirt-csi' and look for csi-driver-kubevirt-controller deployment, or query operator subscriptions with 'oc get subs -n openshift-csi'Affected if The csi-driver-kubevevirt-controller deployment exists and is running
-
Enumerate Persistent Volumes in the clusterRun 'oc get pv -o jsonpath='{.items[*].metadata.name}'' to list all Persistent Volume namesAffected if Any PV exists with a name matching an HCP worker node name (check worker node names with 'oc get nodes -l node-role.kubernetes.io/worker=')
-
Check for kubevirt-csi StorageClass usageRun 'oc get storageclass | grep kubevirt' to identify kubevirt-csi StorageClasses, then check PVs using that StorageClass with 'oc get pv -o jsonpath="{.items[?(@.spec.storageClassName=~'kubevirt.*')].metadata.name}"'Affected if PVs are bound to kubevirt-csi StorageClasses and could potentially access node volumes
-
Review RBAC permissions for Persistent Volume creationRun 'oc auth can-i create persistentvolumes --as=<system:serviceaccount>' for various users/groups, or inspect ClusterRoleBindings with 'oc get clusterrolebinding | grep -i persistentvolume'Affected if Users other than cluster-admins have permissions to create Persistent Volumes
If OpenShift Virtualization HCP with kubevirt-csi is deployed and non-admin users can create Persistent Volumes that match worker node names, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2024-1725
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRestrict Persistent Volume creation permissions through RBAC policies and limit who can interact with the kubevirt-csi driver to prevent attackers from mounting worker node volumes.
Consult Red Hat Security Advisory for specific fixed version (typically 4.16 or later patch release)
- Contact Red Hat customer support or consult the official Red Hat Security Advisory (RHSA) for CVE-2024-1725 to obtain the exact patch version and detailed remediation steps.
- Verify your OpenShift Container Platform version using 'oc get clusterversion'
- If running an affected version (4.13, 4.14, or 4.15), plan an upgrade to the version specified in the Red Hat Security Advisory as containing the fix.
- Before upgrading in production, test the upgrade in a staging environment to ensure compatibility with your workloads.
- After upgrading, verify the kubevirt-csi component has been updated and the vulnerability is remediated.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1725 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1725 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data