Jm Twitter CardsWordPress extension · Jmlapam

CVE-2024-1769

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-03-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 14.1.0 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The JM Twitter Cards plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 14 via the meta description data. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view password protected post content when viewing the page source.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The JM Twitter Cards WordPress plugin (versions up to 14) improperly exposes meta description content from password-protected posts. When a page containing Twitter card meta tags is viewed, unauthenticated attackers can view the page source to extract the protected content that should not be accessible without the password.

MitigationUpdate the JM Twitter Cards plugin to version 15 or later, which should contain a fix that prevents password-protected post content from being included in meta description tags.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Jm Twitter CardsWordPress extension
Affected:< 14.1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify JM Twitter Cards plugin installation
    Navigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins. Look for 'JM Twitter Cards' in the list of active plugins.
    Affected if The JM Twitter Cards plugin appears in the installed plugins list.
  2. Check installed plugin version
    In the Plugins list, locate JM Twitter Cards and note the version number displayed beneath the plugin name. Compare this version to the affected range (< 14.1.0).
    Affected if The installed version is 14.0.0 or any version below 14.1.0.
  3. Identify password-protected posts
    In WordPress admin, go to Posts > All Posts. Look for posts marked with a padlock icon, which indicates password protection. Alternatively, query the database: SELECT ID, post_title FROM wp_posts WHERE post_password != '' AND post_status = 'publish';
    Affected if There are published posts that have password protection enabled (non-empty post_password field).
  4. Inspect page source for exposed meta description
    Visit a password-protected post in a browser (without entering the password). Right-click and select 'View Page Source' or press Ctrl+U. Look for the <meta name="description" content="..."> tag. Examine whether the content attribute contains text that should only be visible after entering the password.
    Affected if The meta description tag contains substantive content from the password-protected post that should not be accessible without authentication.

A user is affected if JM Twitter Cards plugin version below 14.1.0 is installed AND password-protected posts exist AND the page source reveals protected content in the meta description tag.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 14.1.0 or later
Fixed in 14.1.0
Interim mitigation

Update the JM Twitter Cards plugin to version 15 or later, which should contain a fix that prevents password-protected post content from being included in meta description tags.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

14.1.0

  1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
  2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
  3. Locate the JM Twitter Cards plugin
  4. Click 'Update now' if an update is available, or manually upload version 14.1.0
  5. Verify the plugin is running version 14.1.0 after updating

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Jm Twitter Cards Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1769 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1769 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data