CVE-2024-1805
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe wpbakery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the button onclick attribute in all versions up to, and including, 7.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor access or higher, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe WPBakery page builder plugin for WordPress versions up to 7.5 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS) via the button onclick attribute. Authenticated attackers with contributor-level access or higher can inject malicious JavaScript through insufficient input sanitization that is not properly escaped upon output, causing scripts to execute when users access compromised pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check WPBakery Page Builder versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins > WPBakery Page Builder and read the Version number. Alternatively, check the plugin header in /wp-content/plugins/js_composer/include/classes/core/class-wpb-map.php or the main plugin file.Affected if Version is below 7.6 (any version up to and including 7.5)
-
Verify if contributor-level or higher users existNavigate to WordPress admin > Users and review user accounts. Check the Role column for any users with Contributor, Author, Editor, or Administrator roles that may belong to untrusted parties.Affected if Any untrusted user with Contributor, Author, or higher role exists on the site
-
Inspect posts/pages for malicious onclick attributesSearch the WordPress database (wp_posts table) or export content and search for 'onclick=' strings within button elements or VC elements. Use SQL: SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE post_content LIKE '%onclick=%';Affected if Any button element or Visual Composer element contains suspicious or encoded onclick attributes
-
Review recent content edits by contributor-level usersIn WordPress admin, check Posts or Pages edited recently. Look for custom button elements or link elements where onclick JavaScript may have been injected. Focus on content created by users with Contributor or Author roles.Affected if Button or link elements with JavaScript in onclick attributes were added by lower-privilege users
The environment is affected if WPBakery Page Builder version is below 7.6 AND untrusted users with contributor-level access exist on the site, or if compromised content with malicious onclick attributes is present in posts or pages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.6
Update WPBakery page builder to version 7.6 or later. Until patched, limit user registration to trusted roles only and consider implementing Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution.
WPBakery Page Builder version 7.6 or later
- 1. Backup your WordPress database and files before making any changes
- 2. Log in to WordPress admin dashboard
- 3. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- 4. Locate 'WPBakery Page Builder' (also known as Visual Composer) in the plugin list
- 5. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to upgrade to version 7.6 or later
- 6. After updating, verify the plugin version shows 7.6 or higher under Plugins > Installed Plugins
- 7. Clear any caching plugins or server-side caches
- 8. Test that the button element functionality works correctly on pages using the plugin
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1805 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1805 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data