CVE-2024-1882
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability allows an already authenticated admin user to create a malicious payload that could be leveraged for remote code execution on the server hosting the PaperCut NG/MF application server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis PaperCut NG/MF vulnerability allows an authenticated administrator to craft a malicious payload leading to remote code execution on the application server. The attack requires valid admin credentials, but once achieved, enables full server compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 20.1.10>= 21.0.0, < 21.2.14>= 22.0.0, < 22.1.5>= 23.0.1, < 23.0.7< 20.1.10>= 21.0.0, < 21.2.14>= 22.0.0, < 22.1.5>= 23.0.1, < 23.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed PaperCut product and versionLocate the PaperCut installation directory and check the version file or about page in the admin interface. The version is typically displayed in the product name or in server logs.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: < 20.1.10; >= 21.0.0 and < 21.2.14; >= 22.0.0 and < 22.1.5; >= 23.0.1 and < 23.0.7
-
Confirm product typeVerify whether the installation is PaperCut NG or PaperCut MF by checking the product name in the admin interface or installation files.Affected if The product is PaperCut NG or PaperCut MF and the version is in the affected ranges listed above.
-
Assess admin interface exposureDetermine if the PaperCut admin web interface is accessible from network locations that contain untrusted users. Check firewall rules, network ACLs, or reverse proxy configurations that expose the admin portal.Affected if The admin interface is reachable from untrusted network segments or the internet.
-
Review admin account activityExamine admin login logs, recent admin sessions, and account creation/modification events for unauthorized or unexpected administrative actions.Affected if There are admin sessions or account changes that were not performed by known, authorized administrators.
You are affected if PaperCut NG or MF is installed with a version in the vulnerable ranges AND the admin interface is accessible to untrusted users or shows unauthorized admin activity.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.1.1021.2.1422.1.5
Apply the vendor-released patch for CVE-2024-1882 and restrict admin access to trusted personnel only. Consider network segmentation to limit the PaperCut server's exposure.
Upgrade to version 20.1.10 (if on 19.x/20.x), 21.2.14 (if on 21.x), 22.1.5 (if on 22.x), or 23.0.7 (if on 23.x) - choose the nearest fixed version at or above your current release
- 1. Identify the currently installed PaperCut NG/MF version from the server's administration console or installation
- 2. Based on the current version, determine the appropriate fixed release to upgrade to
- 3. Download the corresponding fixed version installer from the official PaperCut website (www.papercut.com)
- 4. Back up the PaperCut application data and configuration files before proceeding
- 5. Stop the PaperCut service on the application server
- 6. Run the installer for the fixed version, following the on-screen upgrade instructions
- 7. Once installation completes, verify the service starts successfully
- 8. Log into the admin console and confirm the version reflects the patched release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1882 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1882 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data