CVE-2024-1890
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability whereby an attacker could send a malicious link to an authenticated operator, which could allow remote attackers to perform a clickjacking attack on Sunny WebBox firmware version 1.6.1 and earlier.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA clickjacking vulnerability in Sunny WebBox firmware 1.6.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to embed the authenticated web interface in an invisible iframe, tricking users into performing unintended actions by layering deceptive UI elements over legitimate buttons.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.61CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Sunny WebBox firmware versionAccess the device's web interface and navigate to the system information or firmware version page, or check the device documentation for version lookup methodsAffected if The firmware version is 1.6.1 or lower (1.61 or earlier)
-
Inspect HTTP response headers for X-Frame-OptionsUse browser developer tools (Network tab), curl -I, or a similar tool to fetch the login page or authenticated interface and examine the response headers for the X-Frame-Options headerAffected if The X-Frame-Options header is missing, or set to ALLOW or not set to DENY or SAMEORIGIN
-
Inspect HTTP response headers for Content-Security-PolicyExamine the HTTP response headers for a Content-Security-Policy header and verify if the frame-ancestors directive is present and properly restricts embeddingAffected if The Content-Security-Policy header is missing or does not include frame-ancestors directive to block iframe embedding
-
Verify iframe embeddability (optional confirmation)Create a test HTML page with an iframe pointing to the Sunny WebBox web interface URL and attempt to load it in a browser, or use a security testing tool to check if the page can be framedAffected if The page loads successfully inside the iframe, confirming it can be embedded
You are affected if your Sunny WebBox firmware is version 1.61 or earlier AND the HTTP responses lack X-Frame-Options: DENY/SAMEORIGIN or a Content-Security-Policy with frame-ancestors directive to prevent iframe embedding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement X-Frame-Options: DENY or SAMEORIGIN header, or Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors directive, on all HTTP responses to prevent the interface from being embedded in iframes.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1890 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1890 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data