CVE-2024-1900
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper session management in the identity provider authentication flow in Devolutions Server 2023.3.14.0 and earlier allows an authenticated user via an identity provider to stay authenticated after his user is disabled or deleted in the identity provider such as Okta or Microsoft O365. The user will stay authenticated until the Devolutions Server token expiration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDevolutions Server does not properly validate user status with the identity provider during session management, allowing authenticated sessions to persist even after a user's account is disabled or deleted in the IdP (Okta, Microsoft O365). Sessions remain valid until the Devolutions Server token expires rather than being invalidated upon IdP user state changes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2023.3.16.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Devolutions Server versionCheck the installed version of Devolutions Server in your environment. This is typically found in the application itself under About or in the installation directory. Compare your version against the affected range: any version <= 2023.3.16.0Affected if The installed version is 2023.3.16.0 or lower
-
Confirm SAML/SSO IdP authentication is enabledCheck if Devolutions Server is configured to use SAML-based single sign-on with an external identity provider, specifically Okta or Microsoft O365. This is typically configured in the authentication or security settings of the Devolutions Server admin consoleAffected if SAML authentication with Okta or Microsoft O365 is active and in use
-
Review session token expiration settingsInspect the configured token or session lifetime settings in Devolutions Server. Look for the token expiration duration configured for SAML sessionsAffected if Token expiration is set to a long duration (hours to days), creating a window where stale sessions remain valid
-
Verify IdP user state synchronizationDetermine whether Devolutions Server has any mechanism to periodically query the identity provider to validate that the user account is still active, enabled, and not deleted. Check if there is any integration that pulls user status changes from Okta or Microsoft O365 in near-real-timeAffected if No real-time or near-real-time synchronization with the IdP exists; user state changes in the IdP are not reflected in active sessions
-
Check session invalidation configurationReview the session management configuration to see if there is any mechanism to revoke active sessions when the user's account becomes disabled or deleted in the identity providerAffected if Sessions are not automatically invalidated when a user is disabled or deleted in the IdP; sessions remain active until natural token expiration
You are affected if you run Devolutions Server version 2023.3.16.0 or lower with SAML/SSO authentication (Okta or Microsoft O365) and do not have real-time session validation against the IdP configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement real-time or near-real-time session validation against the identity provider to revoke sessions when a user's account is disabled or deleted, or reduce token expiration times to limit the window of unauthorized access.
Devolutions Server 2023.3.17.0 or later
- 1. Identify the current installed version of Devolutions Server by accessing the Administration section in the web interface or checking the installed software.
- 2. Backup the Devolutions Server database and configuration files before performing any upgrade.
- 3. Download the latest version of Devolutions Server from the official Devolutions download page at devolutions.net/server or your licensed download area.
- 4. Stop the Devolutions Server service before applying the update.
- 5. Install the update following the standard Devolutions Server upgrade procedure.
- 6. Restart the Devolutions Server service after installation completes.
- 7. Verify that users authenticated via identity provider (Okta, Microsoft O365) are now properly de-authenticated when disabled or deleted in the identity provider.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-1900 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-1900 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data