CVE-2024-20006
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn da, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS08477148; Issue ID: ALPS08477148.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOut of bounds write vulnerability in a system daemon (identified by ALPS) due to a missing bounds check. The flaw allows local privilege escalation to System execution level without requiring user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2022q3= 11.0= 19.07.0= 21.02.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device firmware or OS typeDetermine if the system is running RDKB (Rdkcentral), Google Android, or OpenWrt. This can be done via /etc/os-release, uname -a, or checking system information menus.Affected if The system is running one of the listed platforms (RDKB, Android 11.0, or OpenWrt 19.07.0/21.02.0)
-
Check installed firmware or OS versionRun 'version' or 'cat /etc/os-release' to obtain the exact installed version. For RDKB devices, check the firmware version via web UI or SNMP. For Android, check Settings > About Phone > Android version. For OpenWrt, run 'cat /etc/openwrt_version' or check /etc/banner.Affected if The installed version matches exactly 2022q3 for RDKB, 11.0 for Android, 19.07.0 for OpenWrt, or 21.02.0 for OpenWrt
-
Locate the ALPS system daemonSearch for processes or services labeled as ALPS or system daemons that handle the identified vulnerable component. Check running processes via 'ps' or 'top' and look for ALPS-related services. Review init scripts or systemd services.Affected if An ALPS system daemon is present and running on the device with the affected OS version
-
Verify daemon executes with elevated privilegesCheck the process ownership and permissions of the ALPS daemon using 'ps aux | grep [daemon_name]' and 'ls -la /path/to/daemon' or equivalent. Determine if it runs as root or a privileged user.Affected if The ALPS daemon runs with root or system-level privileges, which is required for the privilege escalation to be exploitable
-
Confirm the daemon is accessible from the attack surfaceVerify the daemon is exposed via a local service, socket, or interface that a local attacker could interact with. Check for exposed ports, Unix sockets, or IPC mechanisms via 'netstat -tulpn' or reviewing service configurations.Affected if The daemon is accessible locally without authentication barriers, allowing a local user to trigger the vulnerable code path
A system is affected if it runs exactly version 2022q3 (RDKB), 11.0 (Android), 19.07.0, or 21.02.0 (OpenWrt) AND contains the vulnerable ALPS system daemon running with elevated privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patch ALPS08477148 which adds proper bounds validation to prevent the out of bounds write condition in the affected daemon.
MediaTek ALPS release containing patch ALPS08477148 (any release newer than 2022q3 for RDK B; Android 12+ for Android; newer OpenWRT with patched MediaTek components)
- 1. Identify the MediaTek chipset/model in the affected device
- 2. Obtain the MediaTek ALPS firmware update that includes patch ALPS08477148
- 3. For RDK B devices: Update to a release newer than 2022q3 that incorporates the MediaTek security patch
- 4. For Android devices: Update to Android 12 or later, or apply the monthly security patch that includes ALPS08477148
- 5. For OpenWRT devices: Update to a newer OpenWRT release that includes the patched MediaTek firmware components
- 6. Verify the update was applied by checking the device firmware version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20006 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20006 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data