CVE-2024-20144
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn V6 DA, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege, if an attacker has physical access to the device, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09167056; Issue ID: MSV-2041.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA missing bounds check in V6 DA leads to an out-of-bounds write vulnerability, allowing local privilege escalation. Exploitation requires physical access to the device and user interaction, with no additional execution privileges needed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0= 2022q3= 2024q1= 13.0= 14.0= 15.0= 19.07.0= 21.02.0= 23.05CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the operating system product and versionRun 'cat /etc/os-release' or 'uname -a' to determine the installed OS product and versionAffected if The product matches Yocto 4.0, RDK B 2022q3 or 2024q1, Android 13.0/14.0/15.0, or OpenWRT 19.07.0/21.02.0/23.05
-
Confirm Android version for Android-based devicesRun 'getprop ro.build.version.release' or check Settings > About Phone > Android versionAffected if The Android version is exactly 13.0, 14.0, or 15.0
-
Confirm OpenWRT version for OpenWRT devicesRun 'cat /etc/openwrt_release' or 'opkg list-installed' to identify the OpenWRT release versionAffected if The OpenWRT release is exactly 19.07.0, 21.02.0, or 23.05
-
Check for presence of V6 DA componentSearch for V6 DA related kernel modules or drivers: 'lsmod | grep -i v6' or 'find /lib/modules -name "*v6*"'Affected if A V6 DA driver or kernel module is loaded and the system version matches an affected release
-
Detect potential privilege escalation indicatorsReview system logs for unexpected privilege escalation events: 'journalctl -b | grep -i error' or 'dmesg | grep -i denied'Affected if Unusual privilege escalation events are found on a system matching affected versions
The system is likely affected if it runs one of the specific version releases (Yocto 4.0, RDK B 2022q3/2024q1, Android 13.0/14.0/15.0, or OpenWRT 19.07.0/21.02.0/23.05) and the V6 DA component is present, with physical access being a key requirement for exploitation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor security patch (ALPS09167056) to affected devices. Since physical access is required for exploitation, ensure devices are not left unattended in accessible locations.
Apply security updates containing MediaTek patch ALPS09167056 (Android devices: January 2024 security patch level or later; other platforms: vendor-specific update)
- 1. Identify the MediaTek chipset/device model affected by checking system information or device documentation
- 2. Check if your device manufacturer has released a security update that includes the ALPS09167056 patch (CVE-2024-20144)
- 3. For Android devices: Go to Settings > Security > Security update level and verify the patch level is January 2024 or later
- 4. For Yocto/RDKB/OpenWRT devices: Check with your device vendor or distribution maintainer for MediaTek firmware updates incorporating the ALPS09167056 patch
- 5. Apply the available security update from your device manufacturer or distribution
- 6. Verify the patch has been applied by checking the security patch date in system settings
- 7. As a secondary mitigation: Restrict physical access to the device and avoid connecting untrusted peripherals
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20144 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20144 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data