CVE-2024-20336
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based user interface of Cisco Small Business 100, 300, and 500 Series Wireless APs could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform buffer overflow attacks against an affected device. In order to exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials for the device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business 100, 300, and 500 Series Wireless APs allows authenticated attackers with admin credentials to send crafted HTTP requests with insufficiently validated user-supplied input, potentially executing arbitrary code as root on the underlying OS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the wireless AP modelAccess the device web interface or check the physical device label, or use SNMP or CDP/LLDP to discover the model number. Common paths: https://[device-ip]/ or check the admin console for device information.Affected if The model is one of: Wap121, Wap125, Wap131, Wap150, Wap320, Wap321, Wap351, or Wap361.
-
Verify the web-based management interface is enabledCheck the device configuration for HTTP or HTTPS management access settings. This is typically found under Administration > Management Access or similar in the web UI. Confirm that web-based management is allowed on at least one interface (LAN or WLAN).Affected if Web-based management interface (HTTP/HTTPS) is enabled and accessible.
-
Confirm admin credentials are in useReview the list of configured administrator accounts on the device. Check if the default admin account (admin) still exists with default or weak credentials, or if any admin账户 has a weak/guessable password.Affected if An admin account with weak, default, or guessable credentials exists, allowing authenticated attackers to exploit the vulnerability.
-
Assess network accessibility of the management interfaceDetermine if the web management interface is reachable from untrusted networks. Check ACLs, VLANs, or firewall rules that may permit external access to the device management IP on ports 80/443.Affected if The web management interface is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet, increasing the likelihood of exploitation.
If the device is one of the affected Wap models (121, 125, 131, 150, 320, 321, 351, 361), the web management interface is enabled, and an attacker could obtain admin credentials, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2024-20336.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied firmware update from Cisco to patch the buffer overflow vulnerability. If no patch is available, restrict web management interface access to trusted networks and enforce strong administrative credential policies to reduce exploitability.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20336 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20336 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data