CVE-2024-20353
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the management and VPN web servers for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to incomplete error checking when parsing an HTTP header. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to a targeted web server on a device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS condition when the device reloads.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in the management and VPN web servers of Cisco ASA and FTD software allows unauthenticated remote attackers to trigger unexpected device reloads via crafted HTTP requests. The root cause is incomplete error checking during HTTP header parsing, leading to a denial of service when the malformed request is processed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.8.1= 9.8.1.5= 9.8.1.7= 9.8.2= 9.8.2.8= 9.8.2.14= 9.8.2.15= 9.8.2.17= 9.8.2.20= 9.8.2.24= 9.8.2.26= 9.8.2.28= 6.2.3= 6.2.3.1= 6.2.3.2= 6.2.3.3= 6.2.3.4= 6.2.3.5= 6.2.3.6= 6.2.3.7= 6.2.3.8= 6.2.3.9= 6.2.3.10= 6.2.3.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco product runningRun 'show version' on the device CLI to determine if it is Cisco ASA or Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)Affected if The device is running Cisco ASA Software or Cisco Firepower Threat Defense
-
Check the installed ASA versionRun 'show version | include Version' in ASA CLI or check 'show version' output for the software version numberAffected if The ASA version matches any of: 9.8.1, 9.8.1.5, 9.8.1.7, 9.8.2, 9.8.2.8, 9.8.2.14, 9.8.2.15, 9.8.2.17, 9.8.2.20, 9.8.2.24, 9.8.2.26, or 9.8.2.28
-
Check the installed FTD versionRun 'show version' in FTD CLI or check the device manager for the FTD software versionAffected if The FTD version matches any of: 6.2.3, 6.2.3.1, 6.2.3.2, 6.2.3.3, 6.2.3.4, 6.2.3.5, 6.2.3.6, 6.2.3.7, 6.2.3.8, 6.2.3.9, 6.2.3.10, or 6.2.3.11
-
Determine if the web management interface is accessibleCheck if the ASA/FTD web server is reachable by testing TCP port 443 or 80 on the device interface IP addressesAffected if The management or VPN web interface is exposed to network where attackers can send HTTP requests
The device is affected if it runs Cisco ASA Software version 9.8.1 through 9.8.2.28 (specific builds listed) or Cisco FTD version 6.2.3.x (specific builds listed) AND has the management or VPN web interface accessible to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Cisco-provided patches or software updates for ASA and FTD. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting access to management and VPN web servers via ACLs to reduce attack surface.
Contact Cisco TAC or check sec.cloudapps.cisco.com for the specific fixed release; Cisco typically addresses ASA vulnerabilities in subsequent 9.x releases and FTD in subsequent 6.x releases
- 1. Identify the exact Cisco ASA or FTD version currently installed using 'show version' command
- 2. Contact Cisco Technical Assistance Center (TAC) or check Cisco's Security Advisory portal at sec.cloudapps.cisco.com for the specific fixed release for your product version
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed software release from Cisco's Software Download center
- 4. Plan maintenance window as the device will need to be reloaded after software upgrade
- 5. Back up current configuration using 'write mem' or 'copy running-config startup-config'
- 6. Upgrade the device using the appropriate method (ASDM, CLI, or ROMMON for failsafe)
- 7. Verify the upgrade completed successfully with 'show version'
- 8. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by checking the new version matches Cisco's fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20353 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20353 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data