CVE-2024-20370
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Cisco FXOS CLI feature on specific hardware platforms for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to elevate their administrative privileges to root. The attacker would need valid administrative credentials on the device to exploit this vulnerability. This vulnerability exists because certain system configurations and executable files have insecure storage and permissions. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating on the device and then performing a series of steps that includes downloading malicious system files and accessing the Cisco FXOS CLI to configure the attack. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain root access on the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Cisco FXOS CLI on specific hardware platforms running ASA or FTD software. An authenticated administrator can exploit insecure storage and permissions on certain system configuration and executable files to gain root access by downloading malicious system files and leveraging the FXOS CLI configuration interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the system product and softwareAccess the CLI and run 'show version' or 'show inventory' to determine if the system runs Cisco FXOS, ASA, or FTD software on affected hardware platformsAffected if The system is identified as a Cisco FXOS-enabled platform running ASA or FTD software and the version cannot be confirmed as patched
-
Determine the FXOS software versionIn the FXOS CLI, run the command to display the FXOS version (typically 'show version' or 'show firmware') and note the exact version numberAffected if The installed FXOS version falls within any unpatched version range or cannot be verified as patched against Cisco advisories
-
Verify file permissions on system configuration filesUse FXOS CLI or system diagnostic commands to inspect permissions on critical system configuration files in /etc, /opt, or similar system directories - look for world-writable or overly permissive ownership on files that should be restrictedAffected if System configuration or executable files have insecure permissions (world-writable, unusual ownership) that would allow a local administrator to modify them
-
Check for presence of downloadable system files via FXOS CLIFrom FXOS CLI, verify if the 'download' or file transfer commands are available for system files, and check if the system allows downloading of configuration or executable files to authenticated administratorsAffected if The FXOS CLI configuration interface permits authenticated administrators to download system configuration or executable files to the local system
-
Confirm administrative access to FXOS CLIVerify that the system has at least one account with administrative privileges to the FXOS CLIAffected if An authenticated administrator account exists with access to the FXOS CLI configuration interface
The environment is affected if it runs Cisco FXOS on hardware platforms supporting ASA or FTD software, has an authenticated administrator with FXOS CLI access, and the installed FXOS/ASA/FTD version is unpatched against CVE-2024-20370.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco security patches for FXOS/ASA/FTD when available. Restrict administrative access and monitor for unauthorized configuration changes via FXOS CLI.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20370 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20370 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data