CVE-2024-20375
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the SIP call processing function of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper parsing of SIP messages. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SIP message to an affected Cisco Unified CM or Cisco Unified CM SME device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition that interrupts the communications of reliant voice and video devices.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in the SIP call processing function of Cisco Unified Communications Manager and Unified CM SME due to improper parsing of SIP messages. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted SIP messages that cause the affected device to reload, disrupting voice and video communications for all reliant devices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.0\(1\)su1= 12.0\(1\)su2= 12.0\(1\)su3= 12.0\(1\)su4= 12.0\(1\)su5= 12.5\(1\)= 12.5\(1\)su1= 12.5\(1\)su2= 12.5\(1\)su3= 12.5\(1\)su4= 12.5\(1\)su5= 12.5\(1\)su6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check CUCM versionLog into the Cisco Unified Communications Manager CLI and run 'show version' or access the Cisco Unified Communications Operating System GUI and navigate to Show License Usage to view the installed version.Affected if The installed version matches 12.0(1)su1 through 12.0(1)su5 or 12.5(1) through 12.5(1)su6.
-
Confirm SIP service is enabledNavigate to Cisco Unified Serviceability > Service Activation or use the CLI command 'show service' to verify that the Cisco SIP Proxy service is activated.Affected if SIP Proxy service is running or enabled on the affected CUCM node.
-
Check for SIP trunk configurationsIn CUCM Administration, go to System > Trunk Configuration and review all configured trunks. Alternatively, use the CLI command 'show sip trunk summary' to list active SIP trunks.Affected if Any SIP trunks are configured and active, indicating SIP is in use.
-
Inspect SIP message handling logsEnable detailed SIP logging via Cisco Unified Serviceability > Trace > Configuration, then review the SIP logs (specifically the sipImAndProxyLog) for anomalies or parsing errors related to incoming SIP messages.Affected if Large volumes of incoming SIP traffic are logged, especially from untrusted sources.
You are affected if you run a vulnerable CUCM version (12.0(1)su1-su5 or 12.5(1)-12.5(1)su6) and have SIP service or SIP trunks enabled, exposing the device to specially crafted SIP messages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patch for CVE-2024-20375 when available. As an interim measure, implement network-level filtering (ACLs or firewall rules) to restrict SIP traffic from untrusted sources to reduce exploitability, while ensuring legitimate SIP communications remain functional.
Cisco Unified Communications Manager 12.0(1) SU5 or later (or migrate to 12.5(1) / 14.x release train for longer support)
- 1. Identify the current Cisco Unified Communications Manager version by accessing the Cisco Unified Reporting tool or via CLI: 'show version'
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- 3. Back up the current Cisco Unified CM configuration using the Disaster Recovery System or backup feature
- 4. Download the fixed release (Cisco Unified Communications Manager 12.0(1) SU5 or later) from Cisco Software Central
- 5. Install the upgrade following Cisco's standard installation guide for CUCM service updates
- 6. After upgrade, verify the SIP service is running: 'utils service list'
- 7. Confirm the new version is installed: 'show version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20375 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20375 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data