Improper Access ControlWeakness · CWE-284

CVE-2024-20397

MEDIUM · 5.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the bootloader of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated attacker with physical access to an affected device, or an authenticated, local attacker with administrative credentials, to bypass NX-OS image signature verification.  This vulnerability is due to insecure bootloader settings. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by executing a series of bootloader commands. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass NX-OS image signature verification and load unverified software.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A vulnerability in the Cisco NX-OS bootloader allows attackers to bypass image signature verification through insecure bootloader settings. Physical access or administrative credentials enable exploitation via a series of bootloader commands, potentially allowing unverified software to load on affected devices.

MitigationApply Cisco-provided patches and configure secure/verified boot settings in the bootloader to enforce NX-OS image signature verification. Restrict physical access to network infrastructure and follow least-privilege principles for administrative accounts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Physical
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify NX-OS version
    Execute 'show version' or 'show install all' command in NX-OS CLI to retrieve the running software version
    Affected if The installed NX-OS version falls within the vulnerable version range for this CVE and has not been patched
  2. Check bootloader secure boot configuration
    Access the bootloader prompt (typically via console during boot) and run 'show secureboot' or 'show boot' commands to inspect signature verification settings
    Affected if Secure boot or image signature verification is disabled, or the bootloader shows insecure configuration values
  3. Verify image signature verification status
    In NX-OS CLI, run 'show secureboot status' or 'show bootvgpeek' if available, or check 'show system redundancy status' for boot integrity details
    Affected if Image signature verification is not enforced or returns a disabled/failed status
  4. Inspect boot logs for tampering indicators
    Review boot logs via 'show logging' or console output during boot for unexpected bootloader entries, boot menu changes, or signature verification bypass messages
    Affected if Boot logs show evidence of unauthorized bootloader access, disabled verification, or loading of unverified images
  5. Confirm physical and administrative access controls
    Review whether the device console is in a secured location and verify that administrative credentials have not been compromised
    Affected if Physical access is unrestricted or administrative credentials are known to have been exposed, enabling bootloader command execution

The device is affected if it runs a vulnerable NX-OS version and has insecure bootloader settings with signature verification disabled or bypassed, especially if physical access or administrative credentials could allow an attacker to access bootloader commands.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply Cisco-provided patches and configure secure/verified boot settings in the bootloader to enforce NX-OS image signature verification. Restrict physical access to network infrastructure and follow least-privilege principles for administrative accounts.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20397 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20397 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data