CVE-2024-20536
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in a REST API endpoint and web-based management interface of Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (NDFC) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with read-only privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to a specific REST API endpoint or web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read, modify, or delete arbitrary data on an internal database, which could affect the availability of the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Cisco NDFC's REST API endpoint and web-based management interface allows an authenticated attacker with read-only privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands by sending specially crafted requests to affected endpoints. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of user-supplied input, enabling the attacker to read, modify, or delete arbitrary data from the internal database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.1.2= 12.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric ControllerAccess the product's web interface or CLI and locate the version information, typically found in the About or System settings sectionAffected if The installed version is exactly 12.1.2 or exactly 12.1.3
-
Confirm the REST API endpoint is enabledCheck the product configuration for REST API service status through the web management interface or CLI commandAffected if The REST API is enabled and accessible in an environment running the affected versions
-
Confirm the web-based management interface is enabledVerify the web management interface service is running through the product's admin console or CLIAffected if The web management interface is enabled in an environment running the affected versions
-
Verify authentication settings for the REST API and web interfaceReview the access control configuration to determine which users have authenticated access, particularly read-only privilege accountsAffected if Untrusted or read-only authenticated users can access the REST API or web interface in versions 12.1.2 or 12.1.3
You are affected if Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller version 12.1.2 or 12.1.3 is running and the REST API or web-based management interface is accessible to authenticated users, including those with read-only privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Cisco's vendor patch when available. In the interim, restrict access to the REST API and web management interface to trusted users only, monitor for anomalous SQL-like patterns in requests, and consider network segmentation to limit exposure.
Upgrade to a version later than 12.1.3 (contact Cisco for specific fixed release number)
- 1. Identify the current version of Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller by accessing the web-based management interface or using the API: GET /api/v1/licenses/status
- 2. If version is 12.1.2 or 12.1.3, plan for upgrade to a fixed release
- 3. Back up current configuration and verify backup integrity before proceeding
- 4. Schedule maintenance window as upgrade may require downtime
- 5. Download the fixed release from Cisco.com or Cisco Smart Software Manager
- 6. Follow Cisco NDFC upgrade procedure documented in the installation guide for your deployment model
- 7. After upgrade, verify the web interface and API endpoints are functioning correctly
- 8. Confirm the version has been updated by checking: GET /api/v1/licenses/status or through web UI
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20536 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20536 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data