AndroidOperating system · Samsung

CVE-2024-20819

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-02-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Out-of-bounds Write vulnerabilities in svc1td_vld_plh_ap of libsthmbc.so prior to SMR Feb-2024 Release 1 allows local attackers to trigger buffer overflow.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A buffer overflow vulnerability in the svc1td_vld_plh_ap function of libsthmbc.so allows local attackers to write beyond buffer boundaries. This occurs prior to the SMR Feb-2024 Release 1 patch on affected Samsung devices, potentially enabling privilege escalation or code execution.

MitigationApply Samsung's SMR Feb-2024 Release 1 or later firmware update to patched libsthmbc.so; verify the library version post-update.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AndroidOperating system
Affected:= 11.0= 12.0= 13.0= 14.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Android version
    Check the device settings: Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADB shell
    Affected if The device runs Android 11.0, 12.0, 13.0, or 14.0
  2. Locate libsthmbc.so library
    Search for the library file on the device filesystem, typically found in /system/lib64/ or /vendor/lib64/ directory. Run 'find / -name libsthmbc.so 2>/dev/null' via ADB shell
    Affected if The library file exists on the device
  3. Extract library version information
    Use 'strings' or 'readelf' tool on the libsthmbc.so binary to look for version metadata, or check the file modification timestamp. Run 'ls -la /path/to/libsthmbc.so' to obtain the file timestamp
    Affected if The library timestamp predates the SMR Feb-2024 Release 1 patch date (February 2024)
  4. Check if vulnerable function is present
    Analyze the binary for the svc1td_vld_plh_ap function using 'nm libsthmbc.so | grep svc1td_vld_plh_ap' or disassemble the function to check for missing boundary checks
    Affected if The function svc1td_vld_plh_ap exists and lacks proper buffer boundary validation in its implementation

A device is affected if it runs Android 11-14, contains the libsthmbc.so library with a pre-Feb-2024 timestamp, and the svc1td_vld_plh_ap function lacks boundary check protections.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply Samsung's SMR Feb-2024 Release 1 or later firmware update to patched libsthmbc.so; verify the library version post-update.

Recommended fix High confidence

SMR Feb-2024 Release 1 (February 2024 Samsung Security Patch Level)

  1. Check current Android security patch level on the device: Settings > About Phone > Software Information > Android security patch level
  2. Verify the device is running Android 11, 12, 13, or 14
  3. Check for system updates: Settings > Software Update > Download and install
  4. Apply the February 2024 Samsung security update (SMR Feb-2024 Release 1) or later
  5. After update, confirm Android security patch level shows February 2024 or later

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Android Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20819 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20819 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data