Missing AuthenticationWeakness · CWE-306

CVE-2024-2104

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
93/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Due to improper BLE security configurations on the device's GATT server, an adjacent unauthenticated attacker can read and write device control commands through the mobile app service wich could render the device unusable.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The device has improper BLE GATT server security configurations that allow an adjacent unauthenticated attacker within BLE range to read and write device control commands intended for the mobile app service. This enables the attacker to manipulate device functionality, potentially rendering the device unusable.

MitigationImplement proper BLE security by requiring authentication, encryption (minimum BLE 4.2 with LE Secure Connections), and authorization for sensitive GATT characteristics; disable or protect write operations without proper pairing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm BLE GATT server is discoverable and accessible
    Use a BLE scanner tool (such as nRF Connect, BLEah, or hcitool) to scan for the device and attempt a GATT connection without any prior pairing or authentication
    Affected if The device's GATT server accepts connections from unauthenticated BLE clients within range
  2. Identify authentication requirements for GATT access
    After connecting, attempt to read or write to GATT characteristics without providing any PIN, passkey, or bonding. Observe whether the device rejects or allows the operation
    Affected if The device permits read or write operations on GATT characteristics without requiring authentication or pairing
  3. Examine GATT characteristic permissions
    Use a GATT client to enumerate all services and characteristics. Check which characteristics are marked as writable or readable without encryption or authentication requirements, particularly those labeled as control or command services
    Affected if Sensitive control or command characteristics are writable or readable without authentication permissions set
  4. Verify BLE link encryption is enforced
    Use a BLE sniffer (such as Ubertooth, nRF Sniffer, or similar) to capture BLE traffic between the device and a client. Determine if the link encryption is enabled and data is transmitted encrypted
    Affected if BLE communication occurs without encryption or uses 'Just Works' pairing with no encryption
  5. Check BLE specification and security mode
    During connection, inspect the BLE version negotiated (such as 4.0, 4.2, 5.0) and the security mode advertised. Verify if LE Secure Connections are supported and required
    Affected if The device uses BLE versions below 4.2 or does not implement LE Secure Connections for GATT operations

The environment is affected if the BLE GATT server allows read or write access to device control commands without requiring authentication, pairing, or encryption from an adjacent attacker.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper BLE security by requiring authentication, encryption (minimum BLE 4.2 with LE Secure Connections), and authorization for sensitive GATT characteristics; disable or protect write operations without proper pairing.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
42.0 hours of engineering $7,360
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2104 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2104 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data