CVE-2024-21601
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') vulnerability in the Flow-processing Daemon (flowd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (Dos). On SRX Series devices when two different threads try to simultaneously process a queue which is used for TCP events flowd will crash. One of these threads can not be triggered externally, so the exploitation of this race condition is outside the attackers direct control. Continued exploitation of this issue will lead to a sustained DoS. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: * 21.2 versions earlier than 21.2R3-S5; * 21.3 versions earlier than 21.3R3-S5; * 21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S4; * 22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S3; * 22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S1; * 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3; * 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R2-S1, 22.4R3. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS versions earlier than 21.2R1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA race condition vulnerability in the Flow-processing Daemon (flowd) on Juniper SRX Series allows an unauthenticated attacker to cause DoS. When two threads simultaneously process a TCP event queue, flowd crashes. One thread cannot be externally triggered, making exploitation partially outside attacker control, but repeated exploitation leads to sustained DoS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device is Juniper SRX SeriesRun 'show chassis hardware' or check 'show system information' to identify the hardware modelAffected if Device is NOT an SRX Series firewall (the vulnerability only affects SRX Series devices)
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show system information' to obtain the installed Junos version numberAffected if Version matches 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, or 22.4 (the affected versions listed)
-
Verify flowd daemon is runningRun 'show system processes extensive' or use 'cli> show system processes | match flowd' to check if flowd process is activeAffected if flowd process is running on the device
-
Confirm flow processing is enabledRun 'show security flow status' to check if flow-based security processing is enabledAffected if Flow processing is enabled (this feature must be active for the race condition to be triggerable)
-
Check for recent flowd crash logsRun 'show log messages' and search for 'flowd' crash entries or core dump files in /var/crash/Affected if Recent flowd crashes or core dumps are present in logs
Device is affected if it is an SRX Series running any Junos version 21.2 through 22.4 with flow processing enabled, as the race condition in flowd can be triggered under these conditions
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Junos OS to one of the fixed versions (21.2R3-S5, 21.3R3-S5, 21.4R3-S4, 22.1R3-S3, 22.2R3-S1, 22.3R2-S2/22.3R3, or 22.4R2-S1/22.4R3) as listed in the Juniper advisory.
Upgrade to 21.2R3-S5 / 21.3R3-S5 / 21.4R3-S4 / 22.1R3-S3 / 22.2R3-S1 / 22.3R2-S2 or later / 22.4R2-S1 or later depending on the current branch
- Identify the current Junos OS version running on the SRX Series device using 'show version' command
- Based on the current version, plan an upgrade to the appropriate fixed release: 21.2R3-S5 or later for 21.2 branch, 21.3R3-S5 or later for 21.3 branch, 21.4R3-S4 or later for 21.4 branch, 22.1R3-S3 or later for 22.1 branch
- Download the appropriate Junos OS upgrade image from the Juniper Networks support portal
- Back up the current device configuration using 'request system snapshot' or 'save configuration'
- Upload the new Junos OS image to the device using 'request system software add <package>'
- Reboot the device to apply the new software version using 'request system reboot'
- After reboot, verify the new version is running with 'show version' and confirm the fix is applied
- Verify flowd daemon is running normally with 'show system processes | match flowd'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-21601 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-21601 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data