CVE-2024-21602
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on ACX7024, ACX7100-32C and ACX7100-48L allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). If a specific IPv4 UDP packet is received and sent to the Routing Engine (RE) packetio crashes and restarts which causes a momentary traffic interruption. Continued receipt of such packets will lead to a sustained DoS. This issue does not happen with IPv6 packets. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on ACX7024, ACX7100-32C and ACX7100-48L: * 21.4-EVO versions earlier than 21.4R3-S6-EVO; * 22.1-EVO versions earlier than 22.1R3-S5-EVO; * 22.2-EVO versions earlier than 22.2R2-S1-EVO, 22.2R3-EVO; * 22.3-EVO versions earlier than 22.3R2-EVO. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved versions earlier than 21.4R1-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA NULL Pointer Dereference in packetio on Juniper ACX7024, ACX7100-32C, and ACX7100-48L allows unauthenticated network attackers to crash the Routing Engine by sending a specific IPv4 UDP packet. The packetio process restarts momentarily and repeated packets cause sustained DoS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm hardware modelRun `show chassis hardware` or `show system information` to identify the device modelAffected if Model is ACX7024, ACX7100-32C, or ACX7100-48L (these are the affected platforms)
-
Check Junos OS Evolved versionRun `show version` to display the installed Junos OS Evolved versionAffected if Version begins with 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, or 22.3 (without the S6/S5/S1 patch suffix that indicates the fix)
-
Verify patch statusCompare your full version string against the fixed releases: 21.4R3-S6-EVO, 22.1R3-S5-EVO, 22.2R2-S1-EVO, 22.2R3-EVO, or 22.3R2-EVOAffected if Running an unpatched version within 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, or 22.3 branches and not yet upgraded to one of the fixed builds
You are affected if your device is an ACX7024, ACX7100-32C, or ACX7100-48L running Junos OS Evolved version 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, or 22.3 without the vendor-supplied security patch.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Junos OS Evolved to the fixed versions: 21.4R3-S6-EVO, 22.1R3-S5-EVO, 22.2R2-S1-EVO/22.2R3-EVO, or 22.3R2-EVO as appropriate for the hardware platform.
21.4R3-S6-EVO, 22.1R3-S5-EVO, 22.2R2-S1-EVO/22.2R3-EVO, or 22.3R2-EVO (depending on current branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS Evolved version running on the affected device (ACX7024, ACX7100-32C, or ACX7100-48L).
- 2. Based on the current version, upgrade to the minimum fixed release: for 21.4-EVO upgrade to 21.4R3-S6-EVO or later; for 22.1-EVO upgrade to 22.1R3-S5-EVO or later; for 22.2-EVO upgrade to 22.2R2-S1-EVO or 22.2R3-EVO or later; for 22.3-EVO upgrade to 22.3R2-EVO or later.
- 3. Download the appropriate upgrade package from the Juniper Networks support portal.
- 4. Follow standard Junos OS Evolved upgrade procedures, ensuring to back up the current configuration.
- 5. After upgrade, verify the packetio process is running normally and confirm the Junos OS Evolved version matches the fixed release.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-21602 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-21602 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data