CVE-2024-21612
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Handling of Syntactically Invalid Structure vulnerability in Object Flooding Protocol (OFP) service of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). On all Junos OS Evolved platforms, when specific TCP packets are received on an open OFP port, the OFP crashes leading to a restart of Routine Engine (RE). Continuous receipt of these specific TCP packets will lead to a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved * All versions earlier than 21.2R3-S7-EVO; * 21.3 versions earlier than 21.3R3-S5-EVO ; * 21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S5-EVO; * 22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S4-EVO; * 22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S3-EVO ; * 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R3-EVO; * 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R2-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved's Object Flooding Protocol (OFP) service allows unauthenticated network attackers to crash the OFP process by sending specially crafted TCP packets to an open OFP port. This causes the Routine Engine to restart, and continuous attacks result in sustained DoS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.2= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the device runs Junos OS EvolvedExecute 'show version' or 'show system information' and look for 'Evolved' in the OS description or model number indicating Evolved platformAffected if The device is running Junos OS Evolved (not standard Junos OS)
-
Identify the installed Junos OS Evolved versionRun 'show version detail' or 'request system version' to obtain the exact version number such as 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, or 22.4Affected if The version matches one in the affected list: any version below 21.2, or exactly 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, or 22.4
-
Verify if the Object Flooding Protocol (OFP) service is enabledRun 'show protocol ofp' or check the OFP service configuration via 'show configuration protocols ofp'Affected if OFP is enabled and running on the device
-
Determine if OFP ports are exposed to untrusted networksReview firewall ACLs, port exposure settings, or run 'show system connections' to check if OFP TCP port is listening on external interfaces accessible from untrusted networksAffected if OFP service port is reachable from network segments that contain untrusted or external attackers
The environment is affected if the device runs Junos OS Evolved with a version in the affected list and has OFP service enabled and accessible from vulnerable network positions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.2
Apply the vendor-supplied Junos OS Evolved updates (21.2R3-S7-EVO, 21.3R3-S5-EVO, 21.4R3-S5-EVO, 22.1R3-S4-EVO, 22.2R3-S3-EVO, 22.3R3-EVO, 22.4R2-EVO or 22.4R3-EVO or later). As interim mitigation, restrict access to OFP ports via firewall ACLs or network segmentation.
Upgrade to 21.2R3-S7-EVO, 21.3R3-S5-EVO, 21.4R3-S5-EVO, or a later 22.x release (22.1R3-S4-EVO, 22.2R3-S3-EVO, 22.3R3-EVO, or 22.4R2/22.4R3-EVO)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS Evolved version using 'show version' command
- 2. Based on current version, determine the appropriate fixed release from the following: 21.2R3-S7-EVO or later, 21.3R3-S5-EVO or later, 21.4R3-S5-EVO or later, 22.1R3-S4-EVO or later, 22.2R3-S3-EVO or later, 22.3R3-EVO or later, or 22.4R2-EVO/22.4R3-EVO
- 3. Review Juniper Networks upgrade documentation and release notes for the target version
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades require system downtime
- 5. Back up current configuration using 'request system configuration backup'
- 6. Download the target Junos OS Evolved software from Juniper support portal
- 7. Install the upgrade using 'request system software add <package> reboot'
- 8. After reboot, verify the new version with 'show version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-21612 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-21612 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data