CVE-2024-21685
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis High severity Information Disclosure vulnerability was introduced in versions 9.4.0, 9.12.0, and 9.15.0 of Jira Core Data Center. This Information Disclosure vulnerability, with a CVSS Score of 7.4, allows an unauthenticated attacker to view sensitive information via an Information Disclosure vulnerability which has high impact to confidentiality, no impact to integrity, no impact to availability, and requires user interaction. Atlassian recommends that Jira Core Data Center customers upgrade to latest version, if you are unable to do so, upgrade your instance to one of the specified supported fixed versions: Jira Core Data Center 9.4: Upgrade to a release greater than or equal to 9.4.21 Jira Core Data Center 9.12: Upgrade to a release greater than or equal to 9.12.8 Jira Core Data Center 9.16: Upgrade to a release greater than or equal to 9.16.0 See the release notes. You can download the latest version of Jira Core Data Center from the download center. This vulnerability was found internally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn unauthenticated information disclosure vulnerability in Jira Core Data Center allows attackers to view sensitive information with high confidentiality impact. The vulnerability was introduced in versions 9.4.0, 9.12.0, and 9.15.0 and requires user interaction to exploit.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.4.0, < 9.4.21>= 9.12.0, < 9.12.8>= 9.15.0, < 9.16.0>= 9.4.0, < 9.4.21>= 9.12.0, < 9.12.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Jira product typeAccess the Jira administration console or check the installation to determine if you are running Jira Data Center or Jira Server. The about page at /about.jspa displays the product type.Affected if Running Jira Data Center or Jira Server
-
Determine installed Jira versionNavigate to Jira administration > System > Troubleshooting and support > About, or access the /about.jspa page. The version number is displayed in the format X.Y.Z.Affected if Version falls within any of the affected ranges: 9.4.0 to 9.4.20, 9.12.0 to 9.12.7, or 9.15.0 to 9.15.x (below 9.16.0)
-
Verify version is in affected rangeCompare your installed version number against the affected version ranges. For Jira Data Center: 9.4.0-9.4.20, 9.12.0-9.12.7, or 9.15.0-9.15.x. For Jira Server: 9.4.0-9.4.20 or 9.12.0-9.12.7.Affected if Installed version is 9.4.0 through 9.4.20, 9.12.0 through 9.12.7, or 9.15.0 through 9.15.x (below 9.16.0)
Your Jira instance is affected if it is running Jira Data Center or Server version 9.4.0-9.4.20, 9.12.0-9.12.7, or 9.15.0-9.15.x.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.4.219.12.89.16.0
Upgrade Jira Core Data Center to version 9.4.21+, 9.12.8+, or 9.16.0+ depending on your current release line to remediate this vulnerability.
Jira Data Center/Server 9.4.21+, 9.12.8+, or 9.16.0+ (preferably latest stable 9.16.x)
- Back up your Jira instance and database before upgrading
- Download the appropriate fixed version of Jira from Atlassian's official download center
- For Jira Data Center 9.4.x: Upgrade to version 9.4.21 or later
- For Jira Data Center 9.12.x: Upgrade to version 9.12.8 or later
- For Jira Data Center 9.15.x: Upgrade to version 9.16.0 or later
- For Jira Server 9.4.x: Upgrade to version 9.4.21 or later
- For Jira Server 9.12.x: Upgrade to version 9.12.8 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Jira version in the administration console
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-21685 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-21685 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data