Icegram ExpressWordPress extension · Icegram

CVE-2024-21748

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-06-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.1.22 or later.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Icegram.This issue affects Icegram: from n/a through 3.1.21.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A missing authorization vulnerability exists in the Icegram WordPress plugin affecting versions through 3.1.21. The vulnerability allows unauthorized users to access certain functions or data that should require proper authentication and privilege verification.

MitigationUpgrade Icegram to version 3.1.22 or later to obtain the patched version. If immediate patching is not possible, disable the plugin until an update can be applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Icegram ExpressWordPress extension
Affected:< 3.1.22

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the Icegram plugin version in WordPress
    In the WordPress admin dashboard, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Find 'Icegram Express' or 'Icegram' in the list and note the version number displayed beneath the plugin name.
    Affected if The displayed version is any version before 3.1.22 (for example, 3.1.21, 3.1.20, 3.0.x, etc.)
  2. Verify the plugin file header for version confirmation
    Access the plugin directory via FTP or file manager. Navigate to wp-content/plugins/icegram-express or icegram and open the main plugin file (usually icegram-express.php or similar). Look for the version comment header: 'Version: x.x.x'
    Affected if The version listed in the plugin header is below 3.1.22
  3. Check for active API endpoints or public-facing features
    Icegram Express is a marketing automation plugin. Review if the plugin has any REST API routes or public-facing forms enabled. This vulnerability affects unauthenticated access, so any active Icegram features could potentially be impacted.
    Affected if The plugin is active and version is below 3.1.22

A user is affected if the installed Icegram Express plugin version is any version prior to 3.1.22, as the missing authorization vulnerability exists in all those versions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.1.22 or later
Fixed in 3.1.22
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Icegram to version 3.1.22 or later to obtain the patched version. If immediate patching is not possible, disable the plugin until an update can be applied.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Icegram Express 3.1.22 or later

  1. Backup your WordPress site before making any changes
  2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in WordPress admin
  3. Find Icegram Express (may be listed as Icegram) in the plugin list
  4. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to update to version 3.1.22 or later
  5. Alternatively, download version 3.1.22 or latest version from the WordPress plugin repository and upload manually
  6. Verify the plugin updated successfully by checking the installed version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Icegram Express Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-21748 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-21748 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data