CVE-2024-21782
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBIG-IP or BIG-IQ Resource Administrators and Certificate Managers who have access to the secure copy (scp) utility but do not have access to Advanced shell (bash) can execute arbitrary commands with a specially crafted command string. This vulnerability is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-5873. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a command injection vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP and BIG-IQ's SCP (secure copy) utility. Users with Resource Administrator or Certificate Manager roles who normally lack bash shell access can execute arbitrary system commands by using specially crafted strings within SCP commands. The flaw exists because the previous fix for CVE-2020-5873 was incomplete, leaving a bypass in the command sanitization logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4= 17.1.0>= 8.0.0, <= 8.3.0>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4= 17.1.0>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4= 17.1.0>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4= 17.1.0>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4= 17.1.0>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4= 17.1.0>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4= 17.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed F5 product and versionRun `tmsh show sys version` or check the BIG-IP/iQ version through the web UI (System > Software Management > ISO Image)Affected if The version falls within: 15.1.0 to 15.1.8, 16.1.0 to 16.1.3, or 17.1.0 for BIG-IP modules; or 8.0.0 to 8.3.0 for BIG-IQ Centralized Management
-
Confirm the product is BIG-IP or BIG-IQRun `tmsh show sys hardware` or check the system information in the web UI under DashboardAffected if The system is running BIG-IP (any module) or BIG-IQ Centralized Management
-
Check if SCP utility is accessible to non-administrative usersReview user role assignments in Access Policy Manager (Access Policy > Role Based Access) or run `tmsh list auth user` to list users and their assigned rolesAffected if Users with Resource Administrator or Certificate Manager roles have SCP utility access
-
Identify users with vulnerable rolesRun `tmsh list auth role all` or check the user role configuration in the web UI under User Management > RoleAffected if Any user account is assigned Resource Administrator or Certificate Manager role without bash shell access restrictions
-
Audit SCP command execution logsReview system logs under /var/log/audit/ or use the web UI (System > Logs > Audit) for SCP command entries, looking for unusual command patternsAffected if There are SCP command executions from users in Resource Administrator or Certificate Manager roles containing unexpected characters or command structures
The environment is affected if running a vulnerable BIG-IP version (15.1.0-15.1.8, 16.1.0-16.1.3, or 17.1.0) or BIG-IQ version (8.0.0-8.3.0) with SCP utility accessible to users holding Resource Administrator or Certificate Manager roles.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.1.916.1.4
Apply vendor-supplied patches for CVE-2024-21782 when released. In the interim, restrict or disable SCP access for non-administrative users and monitor for suspicious command execution patterns.
Big IP products: 15.1.9+, 16.1.4+, or 17.1.1+ | Big Iq Centralized Management: 8.4.0+
- 1. Identify the specific Big IP product (APM, AFM, Analytics, AAM, ASM, DNS, or Fraud Protection Service) and current version running in your environment.
- 2. For Big IP products (APM, AFM, Analytics, AAM, ASM, DNS, Fraud Protection Service): Upgrade to version 15.1.9 or later, 16.1.4 or later, or 17.1.1 or later (17.1.0 is affected).
- 3. For Big Iq Centralized Management: Upgrade to version 8.4.0 or later to address the vulnerability.
- 4. After upgrading, verify the version is no longer in the affected version ranges.
- 5. Test the SCP functionality to ensure the upgrade did not break legitimate operations.
- 6. Review and restrict administrative access to the secure copy (scp) utility according to the principle of least privilege.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-21782 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-21782 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data