Missing AuthenticationWeakness · CWE-306

CVE-2024-21846

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An unauthenticated attacker can reset the board and stop transmitter operations by sending a specially-crafted GET request to the command.cgi gateway, resulting in a denial-of-service scenario.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is an unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability in the command.cgi gateway. An attacker can reset the board and stop transmitter operations by sending a specially-crafted GET request without any authentication, causing service disruption.

MitigationRestrict access to the command.cgi endpoint via network segmentation or firewall rules, and implement proper authentication and authorization controls before allowing board reset operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if command.cgi endpoint is network-accessible
    Scan your perimeter or internal network for exposed web interfaces that serve command.cgi. Use a tool like nmap or curl to probe: curl -I http://TARGET_IP/cgi-bin/command.cgi
    Affected if The endpoint responds to HTTP/HTTPS requests from untrusted networks without requiring authentication
  2. Verify authentication is required for command.cgi
    Attempt an unauthenticated GET request to command.cgi and observe the response: curl -v http://TARGET_IP/cgi-bin/command.cgi
    Affected if The request succeeds without any login session, authorization headers, or credentials
  3. Check for board reset functionality in web interface
    Review the command.cgi parameters and behaviors. If accessible, send a minimal GET request with reset-related parameters and observe if the board resets or transmitter stops
    Affected if The CGI accepts and processes reset commands without verifying user identity first
  4. Inspect access control logs for unauthorized reset attempts
    Review web server logs, CGI logs, or security appliance logs for requests to command.cgi that include reset or board-control parameters, especially from unauthorized IP addresses
    Affected if Logs show unauthenticated or unauthorized requests to command.cgi that triggered board resets or transmitter stop actions
  5. Confirm network segmentation around management interfaces
    Verify that the network segment containing the web management interface (including command.cgi) is isolated from untrusted networks via firewall rules or VLANs
    Affected if The management interface is reachable from networks that should not have administrative access, such as the public internet or guest networks
  6. Determine the installed firmware or software version
    Check the device firmware version, web server software version, or application version through the admin interface, CLI, or HTTP headers: curl -s http://TARGET_IP/ | grep -i version
    Affected if The version cannot be determined or is unknown, making it difficult to confirm if a patch has been applied

The environment is affected if command.cgi is accessible without authentication and accepts reset or transmitter-control commands from unauthenticated users, allowing an attacker to disrupt operations.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict access to the command.cgi endpoint via network segmentation or firewall rules, and implement proper authentication and authorization controls before allowing board reset operations.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-21846 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-21846 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data